Background: The prognosis for nonmetastatic, primary pancreatic squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) is thought to be poor compared with adenocarcinoma (AC); however, this is based on limited data. Additionally, the optimal definitive treatment strategy for nonmetastatic pancreatic SCC is unknown.

Methods: We analyzed patients with nonmetastatic pancreatic cancer using the National Cancer Database for patients diagnosed from 2006 to 2014. Patients were analyzed according to histology-only AC, adenosquamous carcinoma (A-SCC), and SCC were included. The primary endpoint was overall survival (OS) from the time of diagnosis.

Results: A total of 94 928 cases were included; 94 016 AC, 757 A-SCC, and 155 SCC. Median OS was lower for SCC (8.67 months), compared to AC (13.93 months) and A-SCC (12.71 months, P < .001). SCC was resected less often (25.5% vs 46.7% and 74.5%). On subgroup analysis of patients with pancreatic SCC, factors on multivariate analysis associated with improved survival included surgery (HR 0.19, P < .001), and chemotherapy (HR 0.22, P = .01). In 38 patients with SCC undergoing surgical resection, median OS improved (MS = 6.8 months without surgery vs 21.3 months with surgery, P < .001).

Conclusions: Nonmetastatic pancreatic SCC presents with more advanced disease, which is less often surgically resected or treated with any definitive local therapy. In contrast, AC and A-SCC behave more similarly and have higher surgical resection rates and improved survival. In patients with nonmetastatic SCC of the pancreas, surgical resection provides the most significant survival benefit, with systemic chemotherapy providing a less significant benefit, and localized radiation providing no statistical benefit for any subgroup.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7050091PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cam4.2851DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

nonmetastatic pancreatic
12
squamous cell
8
cell carcinoma
8
pancreatic cancer
8
scc
5
impact squamous
4
carcinoma histology
4
histology outcomes
4
nonmetastatic
4
outcomes nonmetastatic
4

Similar Publications

Transarterial chemoembolisation combined with lenvatinib plus pembrolizumab versus dual placebo for unresectable, non-metastatic hepatocellular carcinoma (LEAP-012): a multicentre, randomised, double-blind, phase 3 study.

Lancet

January 2025

Mount Sinai Liver Cancer Program, Division of Liver Diseases, Tisch Cancer Institute, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA; Liver Cancer Translational Research Group, Institut d'Investigacions Biomèdiques August Pi i Sunyer (IDIBAPS), Hospital Clínic, Universitat de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain; Institució Catalana de Recerca i Estudis Avançats, Barcelona, Spain. Electronic address:

Article Synopsis
  • TACE is the standard treatment for patients with unresectable, non-metastatic hepatocellular carcinoma, and this study evaluates the effectiveness of adding lenvatinib and pembrolizumab to TACE compared to a placebo.
  • The multicenter, randomised, double-blind phase 3 study (LEAP-012) involved participants from 137 sites across 33 countries who were randomly assigned to receive either TACE with the new drugs or TACE with a placebo.
  • The primary endpoints were progression-free survival and overall survival, and the results reported are from the first interim analysis, which serves as the final analysis for progression-free survival.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: To improve outcomes for patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma, a complete resection is crucial. However, evidence regarding the impact of microscopically positive surgical margins (R1) on recurrence is conflicting due to varying definitions and limited populations of patients with borderline-resectable and locally advanced pancreatic cancer. Therefore, we aimed to determine the impact of the resection margin status on recurrence and survival in patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma stratified by local tumor stage.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

: Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is a cancer with very poor prognosis despite early surgical management. To date, only clinical variables are used to predict outcome for decision-making about adjuvant therapy. We sought to generate a deep learning approach based on hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) or hematoxylin, eosin and saffron (HES) whole slides to predict patients' outcome, compare these new entities with known molecular subtypes and question their biological significance; : We used as a training set a retrospective private cohort of 206 patients treated by surgery for PDAC cancer and a validation cohort of 166 non-metastatic patients from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) PDAC project.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Indole 3-acetate and response to therapy in borderline resectable or locally advanced pancreatic cancer.

Front Oncol

December 2024

Research Institute of Internal Medicine and Norwegian PSC Research Center, Division of Surgery and Specialized Medicine, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.

Article Synopsis
  • A study explored the link between a bacterial metabolite, indole 3-acetate (3-IAA), and chemotherapy response in non-metastatic pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) patients, building on previous findings in metastatic cases.
  • Researchers measured 3-IAA levels in blood from 124 patients with locally advanced or borderline resectable PDAC before they started chemotherapy, primarily FOLFIRINOX.
  • The results showed no significant association between pre-treatment 3-IAA levels and overall survival, suggesting that the positive effects seen in metastatic cases may not apply to non-metastatic patients, highlighting the need for further research.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: Non-metastatic pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) presents a challenging scenario: the rarity of the disease, the limited number of completed prospective trials, and the shortcomings of comparability across series produce several controversial topics and unanswered questions. Guideline recommendations usually include all the different therapeutic options, de facto transferring to the multidisciplinary team the responsibility on the final decision. This secondary analysis of the GARIBALDI study was aimed to explore the correlation of center type, self-declared volume, and commitment with the overall survival (OS) in patients with non-metastatic PDAC.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!