AI Article Synopsis

  • A study examined how early-onset Alzheimer's disease (EOAD) and frontotemporal lobar degeneration (FTLD) affect brain structure and associated cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) biomarkers in a group of 138 participants, which included subjects with EOAD, FTLD, and controls.
  • Using advanced imaging techniques, researchers identified distinct "AD" and "FTLD" signatures reflected in cortical thickness and fraction anisotropy, which aligned with prior research on these diseases.
  • The analysis revealed that specific CSF biomarkers like Aβ and 14-3-3 correlated with changes in brain structure for AD, while NfL and 14-3-3 were more relevant for FTLD, highlighting the differing roles

Article Abstract

Prior studies have described distinct patterns of brain gray matter and white matter alterations in Alzheimer's disease (AD) and frontotemporal lobar degeneration (FTLD), as well as differences in their cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) biomarkers profiles. We aim to investigate the relationship between early-onset AD (EOAD) and FTLD structural alterations and CSF biomarker levels. We included 138 subjects (64 EOAD, 26 FTLD, and 48 controls), all of them with a 3T MRI brain scan and CSF biomarkers available (the 42 amino acid-long form of the amyloid-beta protein [Aβ42], total-tau protein [T-tau], neurofilament light chain [NfL], neurogranin [Ng], and 14-3-3 levels). We used FreeSurfer and FSL to obtain cortical thickness (CTh) and fraction anisotropy (FA) maps. We studied group differences in CTh and FA and described the "AD signature" and "FTLD signature." We tested multiple regression models to find which CSF-biomarkers better explained each disease neuroimaging signature. CTh and FA maps corresponding to the AD and FTLD signatures were in accordance with previous literature. Multiple regression analyses showed that the biomarkers that better explained CTh values within the AD signature were Aβ and 14-3-3; whereas NfL and 14-3-3 levels explained CTh values within the FTLD signature. Similarly, NfL levels explained FA values in the FTLD signature. Ng levels were not predictive in any of the models. Biochemical markers contribute differently to structural (CTh and FA) changes typical of AD and FTLD.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7267898PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/hbm.24925DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

csf biomarkers
12
alzheimer's disease
8
disease frontotemporal
8
eoad ftld
8
14-3-3 levels
8
multiple regression
8
better explained
8
explained cth
8
cth values
8
levels explained
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!