Comparison of three-dimensional and 4K imaging systems in novice surgeons: a cross-over study.

Background: Laparoscopy has revolutionized the surgical field with the advent of minimally invasive techniques leading to smaller surgical wounds, enhanced recovery, early discharge from the hospital and early return to work. Since the initiation of three-dimensional (3D) systems, studies have failed to prove significant advantages over traditional two-dimensional systems which could be attributed to suboptimal image quality, poor illumination and high cost of earlier systems. Recent advances in stereoscopy have led to the introduction of high-definition (HD) systems with improvement in image quality in both two-dimensional and 3D systems. With HD and new 4K imaging system, the previous data are now obsolete.

Methods: We devised a cross-over study using the Olympus 4K camera imaging system compared with the HD 3D systems using 40 novice surgeons with no prior surgical skills to perform standardized surgical tasks and the groups were crossed over to assess any difference in the learning curve with the imaging systems.

Results: The data showed a statistically significant difference in errors performed with the 3D imaging system with reduction in errors for passing needle through a ring, knot tying, cutting circle and touching circles with a needle. The time taken to perform those tasks was comparable except in knot tying where there was significant reduction in the time taken to tie knots with a P-value of <0.001 in both groups.

Conclusion: The study showed no significant difference in the time to perform tasks. The precision of the tasks was significantly improved with the 3D systems.