A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 1034
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3152
Function: GetPubMedArticleOutput_2016

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

A Novel Mangled Upper Extremity Injury Assessment Score. | LitMetric

A Novel Mangled Upper Extremity Injury Assessment Score.

Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open

Hansjorg Wyss Department of Plastic Surgery, NYU Langone Health, New York, N.Y.

Published: September 2019

Unlabelled: Managing mangled upper extremity injuries is a challenging problem because multiple tissue components including soft tissue, muscle, tendon, bone, nerves, and vessels are involved. The complexity of these injuries has hindered the development of accurate scoring systems and treatment algorithms.

Methods: Patients with mangled upper extremities presenting to a metropolitan level 1 trauma center in New York City over a 10-year period were identified. A mangled upper extremity was defined as any injury to ≥3 tissue components involving the extremity proximal to the digit.

Results: The injuries and outcomes of 76 patients were evaluated and used to create a Mangled Upper Extremity Score (MUES). One point was assigned for each of the following injury characteristics: patient age >40, fasciotomy needed, bony fixation required, bony defect present, revascularization required, crush injury mechanism, degloving or avulsion injury present, and a soft tissue defect >50 cm. The MUES correlated with the number of complications ( value = 1.96 × 10) and length of hospital stay ( value = 3.95 × 10). Next, a Mangled Extremity Severity Score (MESS) equivalent was calculated for each patient. There was no correlation between the MESS and the number of complications ( value = 0.92) or length of hospital stay ( value = 0.35).

Conclusions: Existing extremity scoring systems, including the MESS, are not reliable in predicting the success of limb salvage attempts or outcomes of mangled upper extremity injuries. The MUES developed in this study correlates significantly with important outcome measures including the number of hospital complications and length of hospital stay.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6908405PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/GOX.0000000000002449DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

mangled upper
24
upper extremity
20
length hospital
12
hospital stay
12
extremity
8
extremity injuries
8
tissue components
8
soft tissue
8
scoring systems
8
number complications
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!