The treatment of craniomaxillofacial and cervical wounds in a disaster relief setting is done by clinicians from local medical treatment facilities, non-governmental organisations (NGO), or the military. Although each group and individual surgeon will need specific equipment, this will be restricted by weight, portability and interoperability. We systematically reviewed scientific and commercial publications according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. The papers we identified described the portable equipment that is required to treat patients who need damage-control surgery (decompressive craniectomy, temporary stabilisation, and internal and external fixation of the facial bones) for craniomaxillofacial and cervical injuries in austere or military settings. Austere settings are those in which there is an inherent lack of infrastructure, such as facilities, roads, and power. A total of 35 papers or scientific articles recommended the equipment that is needed to manage these injuries, but we could find no module that was specifically designed for use in these environments. Multiple modules are currently required to provide comprehensive surgical care and many of the items in the existing maxillofacial and neurosurgical kits are rarely used, which increases the cost of initial procurement and resupply. Duplications in equipment between modules also increase the size, weight, and financial cost. We suggest the equipment that is required to make up a rationalised, lightweight, and compact module that can be used for all craniomaxillofacial and cervical operations in austere settings.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bjoms.2019.12.010DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

craniomaxillofacial cervical
16
equipment required
8
austere settings
8
equipment
6
developing craniomaxillofacial
4
cervical
4
cervical equipment
4
equipment module
4
module surgeons
4
austere
4

Similar Publications

Introduction: Tumor boards are a cornerstone of modern cancer treatment. Given their advanced capabilities, the role of Large Language Models (LLMs) in generating tumor board decisions for otorhinolaryngology (ORL) head and neck surgery is gaining increasing attention. However, concerns over data protection and the use of confidential patient information in web-based LLMs have restricted their widespread adoption and hindered the exploration of their full potential.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Head and neck reconstruction following ablative surgery results in alterations to maxillofacial anatomy and function. These postoperative changes complicate dental rehabilitation. An innovative modular, stackable guide system for immediate dental rehabilitation during mandibular reconstruction is presented.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Remineralization is a common strategy for the repair of early demineralized tooth enamels, but the harsh dynamic oral environment often hampers its efficacy. Rapid remineralization is expected to address this challenge, however, the stabilizers of remineralization materials often resist their transformation required for repair. Here, by dissolving the ions of calcium and phosphate in glycerol-dominant solvents, we obtain the calcium phosphate clusters (1-2 nm), which are stabilized by glycerol (with high viscosity and affinity to clusters), but can perform a fast enamel repair via the water-triggered transformation in both static and dynamic environments.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Multidisciplinary tumor boards in oral cavity cancer: survival effect due to balancing guideline adherence and treatment delays.

Front Oral Health

November 2024

Department of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Medical Center-University of Freiburg, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany.

Objectives: The purpose of the study was to assess the impact of a pretherapeutic Multidisciplinary Tumor Board (MTB) presentation on the prognosis and treatment outcomes in patients with primary oral cavity carcinoma.

Materials And Methods: This single-center study included 630 patients diagnosed with oral cavity carcinoma treated between 2010 and 2020. The study cohort was divided in a group with and without pretherapeutic MTB presentation.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!