AI Article Synopsis

  • Chorionic villus sampling (CVS) offers quicker results for detecting genetic abnormalities compared to amniocentesis, but it has a higher rate of incomplete results, prompting this study to seek risk factors for such failures.
  • The study, conducted from January 2014 to December 2018, involved 214 CVS procedures, revealing that 34% resulted in failures, with significant differences noted between successful and failed cases related to BMI, gestational age, trophoblastic location, and type of sampling approach.
  • Key factors negatively impacting the success of CVS included higher BMI, the posterior position of the trophoblast, and a transcervical sampling method; these findings suggest considering amni

Article Abstract

Objectives: Chorionic villus sampling (CVS) allows for earlier results for aneuploidy or genomic abnormalities compared to amniocentesis. Nevertheless, the inability to provide complete results has been described as being more frequent with CVS. This study was conducted in order to identify risk factors for such failures.

Study Design: A retrospective single-center study was performed from January 2014 to December 2018. Participants were divided into two groups depending on whether complete CVS results were issued ("successful CVS group") or not ("failed CVS group"). Failure affected preliminary short-term cultures, long-term cultures, or both.

Results: During the study period, 214 CVS were performed, 73 (34%) of which were classified in the failed CVS group. We observed significant intergroup differences between the successful and failed CVS groups for four variables: BMI (respectively 23.9 [±5.88] and 25.9 [±6.13] kg/m), term at sampling (12.9 [±1.35] and 12.6 [±1.09] weeks gestation), trophoblastic location (posterior in 49 [40%] and 37 [66%] cases), and sampling approach (transcervical in 54 [43%] and 36 [64%] cases) ( < .05). In a stepwise binary logistic regression analysis, higher BMI, posterior trophoblastic location, and transcervical sampling approach were the only variables negatively influencing CVS success, with respective aOR [95% CI] of 0.947 [0.898; 0.996], 0.322 [0.160; 0.634], and 0.466 [0.238; 0.900].

Conclusions: In the presence of CVS failure risk factors, a discussion could be initiated regarding a deferred amniocentesis as a first option.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/14767058.2020.1712713DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

risk factors
8
chorionic villus
8
villus sampling
8
cvs
8
cvs group"
8
failed cvs
8
factors failed
4
failed chorionic
4
sampling
4
sampling 4-year
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!