The efficacy and safety of ustekinumab have been demonstrated in randomized clinical trials; however, there are few real-life data evaluating ustekinumab. This observational, retrospective follow-up study included 33 patients with moderate to severe psoriasis vulgaris. Patients were > 18 years old and received at least 16 weeks of ustekinumab. The efficacy of treatment was evaluated as PASI50, PASI75, and PASI90 response rates at 16, 28, 52, 76, and 100 weeks. Side effects associated with ustekinumab were recorded. Of 33 patients, 24 (72.7%) had received 45 mg ustekinumab and 9 (27.3%) 90 mg ustekinumab. At the 16th week of the treatment, 97% of the patients had PASI50, 57.6% had PASI75, and 33.3% had PASI90 response rates. At 16, 28, 52, 76, and 100 weeks, PASI50, 75, and 90 responses were generally higher in naive to biologics and in the 45 mg group than in nonnaive to biologics and in the 90 mg group but the differences were not statistically significant. In conclusion, ustekinumab is an effective and safe treatment option for patients with moderate to severe psoriasis vulgaris. It seems to be more effective in naive to biologics and patients with normal weight.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/dth.13224DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

ustekinumab
8
patients moderate
8
moderate severe
8
severe psoriasis
8
psoriasis vulgaris
8
pasi90 response
8
response rates
8
rates 100 weeks
8
naive biologics
8
patients
6

Similar Publications

The burden of autoimmune diseases is rising worldwide. The expansion of the population of patients eligible for severe asthma biological therapy we are seeing in clinical practice could lead to the simultaneous use of different monoclonal antibodies. We present the case of biological combination therapy with ustekinumab and benralizumab in a patient with ulcerative colitis and severe eosinophilic asthma.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: Early biologic intervention after diagnosis has shown improved clinical and endoscopic outcomes in patients with Crohn's disease (CD), while very little is known about the effectiveness of early versus late administration of Ustekinumab (UST).

Objectives: We aimed to compare early versus late UST use in managing CD and identify potential predictors associated with clinical and endoscopic outcomes.

Design: This was a retrospective observational study.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: Ustekinumab is a fully human interleukin-12/23 (p40) inhibitor used to treat immune-mediated diseases. However, the limitations of clinical trials and the expanding target population necessitate an update on the ustekinumab-associated adverse events (AEs). We conducted signal mining for ustekinumab-related AEs using the United States Food and Drug Administration Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS).

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Objectives: We aimed to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of clinical decision support tool (CDST)-guided initial selective intensive induction therapy (IIT) for patients with Crohn's disease (CD) who were treated with ustekinumab (UST) and to identify those most likely to benefit from IIT.

Methods: Patients with active CD were included in this multicenter retrospective study and were categorized as low-, intermediate-, and high-probability responders according to the UST-CDST. IIT was defined as intensive induction by two or three initial doses of weight-based intravenous UST administration.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!