Operationalization of skin self-examination in randomized controlled trials with individuals at increased risk for melanoma: A systematic review.

Patient Educ Couns

Department of Social and Behavioral Sciences, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA, United States; Lady Davis Institute for Medical Research, Jewish General Hospital, Montréal, Quebec, Canada; Louise Granofsky Psychosocial Oncology Program, Segal Cancer Center, Montreal, Canada; Psychosocial Oncology Program, McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, Canada.

Published: May 2020

AI Article Synopsis

  • The study aimed to explore how skin self-examination (SSE) was defined and assessed in RCTs aimed at increasing melanoma awareness among high-risk individuals.
  • The search covered multiple databases and trial registries, identifying 13 unique RCTs, but only 6 provided clear definitions or instructions for SSE, which varied greatly in measurement approaches.
  • The findings highlighted a lack of validity and reliability in the measuring scales used, suggesting a need for improved psychometric evaluation in future research on SSE.

Article Abstract

Objective: To investigate how skin self-examination was operationalized and the psychometric properties of the scales used to assess this behavior in randomized controlled trials (RCTs) testing interventions that promote SSE among individuals at increased risk for melanoma.

Method: Eight scientific databases (e.g., Medline, EMBASE, CINAHL, PsycINFO) and four trial registries (e.g., Clinicaltrials.gov, UK Clinical Trails Gateway) were searched from inception through April 2, 2019. Three reviewers carried out the selection of relevant trials and conducted data extraction.

Results: The review identified 13 unique RCT's. The definition of skin self-exams, extrapolated from instructions provided to participants during the trials and reported in only 6/13 trials, included periodically checking the skin of the entire body, individually or with partners/mirrors, with or without tracking or monitoring tools, and using the ABCDE criteria to identify early signs of melanoma. There was variability in how skin self-examination behavior was measured with respect to item content, number of items, response format, and type of outcome variable used: continuous or binary). No validity evidence and minimal reliability evidence for the measures were identified.

Conclusions And Practice Implications: Future studies are needed to establish the psychometric properties of measures assessing skin self-examination.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.pec.2019.12.009DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

skin self-examination
16
randomized controlled
8
controlled trials
8
individuals increased
8
increased risk
8
psychometric properties
8
trials
5
skin
5
operationalization skin
4
self-examination
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!