A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3122
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

High performance of 5-aminolevulinic acid-induced fluorescent selective upper tract urinary cytology. | LitMetric

AI Article Synopsis

  • The study aimed to evaluate how effective 5-aminolevulinic acid-induced fluorescent cytology is compared to conventional cytology in diagnosing upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma.
  • Researchers analyzed data from 104 patients who underwent surgical removal of the kidneys and ureters, comparing the sensitivity and specificity of both cytology methods.
  • The results showed that the fluorescent method was significantly more sensitive (90.4% vs 66.3%) while maintaining high specificity (100% vs 98.2%), making it a more effective diagnostic tool regardless of age, sex, or tumor characteristics.

Article Abstract

Objectives: To investigate the efficacy of selective upper tract urinary cytology using extracorporeal 5-aminolevulinic acid for the diagnosis of upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma.

Methods: We evaluated 104 patients who underwent radical nephroureterectomy and were diagnosed pathologically as having upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma between March 2013 and May 2019 in Osaka Rosai Hospital. Preoperatively, we collected upper tract urinary cytology from both sides, and compared the sensitivity and specificity between conventional urine cytology and 5-aminolevulinic acid-induced fluorescent urine cytology.

Results: The sensitivity of 5-aminolevulinic acid-induced fluorescent selective upper tract urinary cytology was significantly higher than conventional cytology (90.4% vs 66.3%, P < 0.001), whereas the specificity was equally high (100% vs 98.2%, P = 1.0). In more detailed analysis, the sensitivity of 5-aminolevulinic acid-induced fluorescent selective upper tract urinary cytology was significantly higher than that of conventional cytology unrelated to patients' age (<76 years: 90.2% vs 68.6%, P = 0.013; ≥76 years: 90.6% vs 64.2%, P = 0.021), sex (male: 89.2% vs 67.5%, P = 0.001; female: 95.2% vs 61.9%, P = 0.02) or pT stage (pT1 or less: 91.4% vs 69.0%, P = 0.005; pT2 or more: 89.1% vs 63.0%, P = 0.006), tumor grade (high grade: 91.0% vs 70.5%, P = 0.002; low grade: 88.5% vs 53.8%, P = 0.013), and tended to be more efficacious for tumors that could not be detected by imaging techniques (83.3% vs 50.0%, P = 0.075).

Conclusions: 5-Aminolevulinic acid-induced fluorescent selective upper tract urinary cytology is more sensitive than conventional cytology for the diagnosis of upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma, regardless of pT stage and tumor grade.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/iju.14170DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

upper tract
16
tract urinary
16
urinary cytology
16
5-aminolevulinic acid-induced
12
acid-induced fluorescent
12
selective upper
12
fluorescent selective
8
upper urinary
8
urinary tract
8
tract urothelial
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!