A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3122
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

A preliminary validation of a Norwegian version of the Tinnitus Sample Case History Questionnaire. | LitMetric

A preliminary validation of a Norwegian version of the Tinnitus Sample Case History Questionnaire.

Scand J Psychol

The Department of Special Needs Education, Faculty of Educational Science, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.

Published: August 2020

AI Article Synopsis

  • There is currently no validated tinnitus questionnaire in Norway, prompting a study to evaluate a Norwegian translation of the Tinnitus Sample Case History Questionnaire (TSCHQ).
  • Over 200 participants completed the questionnaire, with 78% providing responses on two occasions to assess test-retest reliability.
  • The study found the Norwegian TSCHQ to have acceptable reliability, better than a recent Swedish version, and suggests its use by Norwegian researchers and clinicians while recommending further validation.

Article Abstract

At present there is no validated tinnitus questionnaire available in Norway. The aim of the present study was to psychometrically evaluate and report on a Norwegian translation of the Tinnitus Sample Case History Questionnaire (TSCHQ). Furthermore, the results were compared to those of a recent Swedish validation of TSCHQ. More than two hundred (N = 218) participants with tinnitus participated in the study, of which 78% completed the Norwegian TSCHQ on two occasions so that test-retest reliability could be evaluated. Results show that the Norwegian TSCHQ has acceptable test-retest reliability with the exception of 10 items, which is slightly better than the recent Swedish validation of TSCHQ. At the item level, there were both similarities and differences between the Norwegian and Swedish validation studies. It is concluded that the Norwegian TSCHQ is an appropriate measure of patients' history and experience of tinnitus, and while we recommend further validation of the Norwegian TSCHQ, we encourage Norwegian researchers and clinicians to use the Norwegian translation of TSCHQ.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/sjop.12605DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

norwegian tschq
16
swedish validation
12
norwegian
9
validation norwegian
8
tinnitus sample
8
sample case
8
case history
8
history questionnaire
8
norwegian translation
8
tschq
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!