AI Article Synopsis

  • - This study evaluates the effectiveness of bystander interventions aimed at reducing sexual violence and harassment among high school students, specifically comparing sexual majority and minority youth.
  • - A rigorous cluster randomized control trial conducted in Kentucky involved 26 high schools and analyzed survey responses from 74,836 students over five years, finding significant declines in violence acceptance and violent events primarily among sexual majority students.
  • - Despite overall positive outcomes, the intervention was less effective for sexual minority males, suggesting that tailored approaches that address unique experiences and attitudes of sexual minority youth may enhance the effectiveness of these programs.

Article Abstract

Bystander interventions have been highlighted as promising strategies to reduce sexual violence and sexual harassment, yet their effectiveness for sexual minority youth remains largely unexamined in high schools' populations. This rigorous cluster randomized control trial addresses this gap by evaluating intervention effectiveness among sexual majority and minority students known be to at increased risk of sexual violence. Kentucky high schools were randomized to intervention or control conditions. In intervention schools, educators provided school-wide Green Dot presentations (phase 1) and intensive bystander training to student popular opinion leaders (phase 2). Each spring from 2010 to 2014, students attending 26 high schools completed anonymous surveys about violence acceptance and violent events. An analytic sample of 74,836 surveys with no missing data over the 5 years was available. Sexual violence acceptance scores declined significantly over time in intervention versus control schools among all but sexual minority males. This intervention was also associated with reductions in both perpetration and victimization of sexual violence, sexual harassment, and physical dating violence among sexual majority yet not sexual minority youth. Both sexual minority and majority youth experienced reductions in stalking victimization and perpetration associated with the intervention. In this large cluster randomized controlled trial, the bystander intervention appears to work best to reduce violence for sexual majority youth. Bystander programs may benefit from explicitly engaging sexual minority youth in intervention efforts or adapting intervention programs to include attitudes that shape the experience of sexual minority high school youth (e.g., homophobic teasing, homonegativity).

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11121-019-01073-7DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

sexual minority
28
sexual
16
sexual violence
16
violence sexual
16
violence acceptance
12
minority youth
12
sexual majority
12
violence
9
intervention
9
reduce violence
8

Similar Publications

Gender-affirming medical treatment for adolescents: a critical reflection on "effective" treatment outcomes.

BMC Med Ethics

December 2024

Center of Expertise on Gender Dysphoria (CEGD), Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit, De Boelelaan 1118, Amsterdam, 1081 HZ, The Netherlands.

Background: The scrutiny surrounding gender-affirming medical treatment (GAMT) for youth has increased, particularly concerning the limited evidence on long-term treatment outcomes. The Standards of Care 8 by the World Professional Association for Transgender Health addresses this by outlining research evidence suggesting "effective" outcomes of GAMT for adolescents. However, claims concerning what are considered "effective" outcomes of GAMT for adolescents remain implicit, requiring further reflection.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: Violence against sexual and gender minorities is a significant concern on university campuses.

Methods: A needs assessment self-report survey was administered to LGBTQIA+ university campus community members to assess perceptions of vulnerability, interest in, and beliefs related to personal safety/self-defense (PS/SD) training at a public Midwestern university.

Results: Forty-three LGBTQIA+ campus community members responded to the survey.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Purpose: Most research on the structural determinants of substance use and mental health has centered around widely studied factors such as alcohol taxes, tobacco control policies, essential/precursor chemical regulations, neighborhood/city characteristics, and immigration policies. Other structural determinants exist, however, many of which are being identified in the emerging fields of structural stigma, structural racism, and structural sexism. This narrative review surveys the measures and designs used in substance use and mental health studies from these three fields.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!

A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Notice

Message: fwrite(): Write of 34 bytes failed with errno=28 No space left on device

Filename: drivers/Session_files_driver.php

Line Number: 272

Backtrace:

A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: session_write_close(): Failed to write session data using user defined save handler. (session.save_path: /var/lib/php/sessions)

Filename: Unknown

Line Number: 0

Backtrace: