A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3122
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

Comparison of glomerular filtration rate estimation using Jaffé and enzymatic creatinine assays in diabetic patients. | LitMetric

Comparison of glomerular filtration rate estimation using Jaffé and enzymatic creatinine assays in diabetic patients.

J Diabetes Metab Disord

5Endocrinology and Metabolism Research Center, Endocrinology and Metabolism Clinical Sciences Institute, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.

Published: December 2019

Background: Diabetic kidney disease (DKD) develops an end-stage renal failure and is a major cause of death in diabetic patients. A GFR below 60 ml/min per 1.73 m is one of the main markers of DKD. Therefore, the development of an accurate test for diagnosis and monitoring of the mentioned disease would be essential. Here, we examined the impacts of two different kits with different methods for creatinine measurement on the GFR values.

Methods: Blood samples were collected from 80 diabetic patients referring to the clinical laboratory. The levels of serum creatinine were assessed using Jaffé and enzymatic assays by kits from two different manufacturers. Then to assess the eGFR levels, the MDRD equation was used. Further descriptive parameters of both methods and correlation of methods were also calculated.

Results: Descriptive analysis of the data demonstrates a slight increase in the serum creatinine measured by Jaffé assay which leads to a substantial decrease in the levels of eGFR compared to the eGFR calculated by the enzymatic assay. Moreover, eGFR over 60  in enzymatic assay was observed in 27.5% of participants while eGFR of the same participants was below 60  when it was measured by Jaffé method. Consequently, 27.5% positive discordant cases were reported by Jaffé assay followed by misclassifying them as DKD patients compared with the enzymatic assay.

Conclusion: While using Jaffé assay, a low level of eGFR is observed which generates more misclassification into the DKD group and demands to an inclusive consideration by physicians in order to diagnose and monitor the DKD patients.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6915165PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40200-019-00462-7DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

diabetic patients
12
jaffé assay
12
jaffé enzymatic
8
serum creatinine
8
measured jaffé
8
enzymatic assay
8
dkd patients
8
jaffé
6
egfr
6
enzymatic
5

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!