A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 1034
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3152
Function: GetPubMedArticleOutput_2016

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

Discriminating Bacterial Phenotypes at the Population and Single-Cell Level: A Comparison of Flow Cytometry and Raman Spectroscopy Fingerprinting. | LitMetric

AI Article Synopsis

  • Investigating phenotypic heterogeneity is crucial for understanding microbial communities, but there is a lack of standardized methods for analysis.
  • Various optical tools like flow cytometry and Raman spectroscopy are examined in this study to characterize this heterogeneity in Escherichia coli populations.
  • Flow cytometry excels in quantifying phenotypic changes at the population level, while Raman spectroscopy provides detailed biochemical insights at the single-cell level, making both techniques complementary for a comprehensive analysis.

Article Abstract

Investigating phenotypic heterogeneity can help to better understand and manage microbial communities. However, characterizing phenotypic heterogeneity remains a challenge, as there is no standardized analysis framework. Several optical tools are available, such as flow cytometry and Raman spectroscopy, which describe optical properties of the individual cell. In this work, we compare Raman spectroscopy and flow cytometry to study phenotypic heterogeneity in bacterial populations. The growth stages of three replicate Escherichia coli populations were characterized using both technologies. Our findings show that flow cytometry detects and quantifies shifts in phenotypic heterogeneity at the population level due to its high-throughput nature. Raman spectroscopy, on the other hand, offers a much higher resolution at the single-cell level (i.e., more biochemical information is recorded). Therefore, it can identify distinct phenotypic populations when coupled with analyses tailored toward single-cell data. In addition, it provides information about biomolecules that are present, which can be linked to cell functionality. We propose a computational workflow to distinguish between bacterial phenotypic populations using Raman spectroscopy and validated this approach with an external data set. We recommend using flow cytometry to quantify phenotypic heterogeneity at the population level, and Raman spectroscopy to perform a more in-depth analysis of heterogeneity at the single-cell level. © 2019 International Society for Advancement of Cytometry.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cyto.a.23952DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

raman spectroscopy
24
flow cytometry
20
phenotypic heterogeneity
20
single-cell level
12
cytometry raman
8
heterogeneity population
8
population level
8
phenotypic populations
8
phenotypic
7
cytometry
6

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!