A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3122
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

Anatomic Variability of the Human Orbit. | LitMetric

Anatomic Variability of the Human Orbit.

J Oral Maxillofac Surg

Director, Oral Maxillofacial Surgery, Dallas Veterans Affairs Hospital, Dallas, TX.

Published: May 2020

Purpose: Knowledge of the bony orbit and how its volume changes are clinically important in addressing traumatic injuries. Restoration of orbital volume in some patients is critical to achieving successful outcomes after such injuries. In this large cadaveric study, we aimed to assess the average volume, range of bony orbit volumes, degree of volume discrepancy between the right and left orbits, and percentage of skulls with 1- and 1.5-mL orbital volume differences via alginate impressions and volume displacement.

Materials And Methods: This study used 121 skulls (242 orbits) from the University of Texas Southwestern Department of Cell Biology/Anatomy. Seal-press wrap was first adapted to each bony orbit to ensure no damage to the internal orbits, foramina, or fissures. Alginate impressions were then taken and trimmed to encompass the bony orbit. The volume of each impression was calculated via the volume-displacement method.

Results: The average orbital volume was 26.75 mL for the right side and 26.65 mL for the left. The average right-to-left difference between orbits was 0.8 mL, with a range from 0.02 to 3.64 mL. The calculated methodologic error was 0.91% for the right orbit and 1.05% for the left. Approximately 14% and 21% of skulls showed normal left-to-right orbital volume differences of 1.5 mL or greater and 1.0 mL or greater, respectively.

Conclusions: Our data suggest that the average normal asymmetry between the right and left orbital volumes is 0.8 mL, which is 50 to 80% of the orbital volume increase implicated in traumatic enophthalmos. Of the skulls, 17 (14%) showed a right-to-left orbital volume asymmetry of 1.5 mL or greater and 25 (21%) showed an asymmetry of 1.0 mL or greater. The skull-to-skull orbital volume range approached 200%. Thus, this study provides surgeons with important information to consider when reconstructing a traumatized orbit using a computed tomography scan of the unaffected, contralateral orbit.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.joms.2019.11.032DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

orbital volume
28
bony orbit
16
volume
12
orbit
8
orbit volume
8
orbital
8
volume range
8
volume differences
8
alginate impressions
8
15 ml greater
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!