The minimal that kills: Why defining and targeting measurable residual disease is the "Sine Qua Non" for further progress in management of acute myeloid leukemia.

Blood Rev

Section of Hematology, Department of Internal Medicine, Yale University School of Medicine and Yale Comprehensive Cancer Center, New Haven, CT, USA; Cancer Outcomes, Public Policy, and Effectiveness Research (COPPER) Center, Yale University, New Haven, CT, USA. Electronic address:

Published: September 2020

Patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) who achieve morphologic remission in the bone marrow after initial treatment often continue to harbor residual leukemic cells that can give rise to disease relapse. Achievement of a deeper remission has been associated with a reduced risk of relapse and improved event-free and overall survival in several studies. However, standardization of diagnostic techniques, sample acquisition and test timing are needed before minimal, also known as measurable, residual disease (MRD) quantification can be used to guide treatment decision making. Furthermore, clinical trial evidence that preemptive intervention at MRD level can alter the natural history of AML is required. Herein, we outline the current landscape of MRD assessment in AML, summarize the available evidence and challenges, and highlight the potential for MRD status to serve as a surrogate endpoint for hard clinical outcomes and as an approvable endpoint in clinical trials for regulatory purposes.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.blre.2019.100650DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

measurable residual
8
residual disease
8
acute myeloid
8
myeloid leukemia
8
minimal kills
4
kills defining
4
defining targeting
4
targeting measurable
4
disease "sine
4
"sine qua
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!