Functional Outcomes Following Operative and Nonoperative Management of Weber C Ankle Fractures: A Systematic Review.

Weber C ankle fractures are unstable ankle fractures occurring above the syndesmosis. These fractures are often managed operatively, although a small population of patients are still selected for nonoperative management. This study primarily aimed to summarize the current evidence on functional outcomes for Weber C patients managed operatively and nonoperatively. Evidence on secondary outcomes such as complications and radiographic outcomes were also reviewed. This systematic search was conducted according to PRISMA guidelines. A literature search was conducted using the EMBASE, Medline, and Central databases. A total of 26 studies were included in the final analysis. All papers studied the management of Weber C fractures using open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF). Three main functional outcome scores were identified: American Orthopedic Foot and Ankle Society score, Olerud-Molander Ankle Score, and Foot and Ankle Outcome Score. Only 1 study compared operative and conservative management, which showed similar outcomes for either option (median Olerud-Molander Ankle Score 95 [range 20 to 95] vs 100 [70 to 100], respectively). Complications associated with operative management included infection, wound dehiscence, implant failure, and malunion or nonunion. The mean rate of syndesmosis malreduction was 18.2%. This study showed that operative management, regardless of the method of ORIF used, as well as nonoperative management resulted in good functional outcomes, indicating that patient selection for either method is important. However, there is limited evidence on the complications and radiographic outcomes associated with nonoperative management. We recommend further studies to compare all ORIF methods with conservative management and examine the complications associated with nonoperative management.