A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 1034
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3152
Function: GetPubMedArticleOutput_2016

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

Contact burns: the influence of agents and mechanisms of injury on anatomical burn locations in children <5 years old and associations with child protection referrals. | LitMetric

Objective: To identify how causative agents and mechanisms of injury influence the location of an accidental contact burn in children and whether these factors differ in cases referred for child protection (CP) assessment.

Design: Prospective multicentre cross-sectional study.

Setting: 20 hospital sites across England and Wales, including: emergency departments, minor injury units and regional burn units.

Patients: Children less than 5 years old who attended hospital for a contact burn (August 2015 to September 2018).

Main Outcome Measures: Location of burns with respect to agent and mechanism for accidental contact burns. Secondary outcome: mechanism, agent and location of burns referred for CP assessment.

Results: 816 accidental burns and 92 referrals for CP assessment. The most common for accidental burns: mechanism was (68%, 553/816), agent was (24.5%, 200/816) and site was the (69.2%, 565/816). Burns to head and trunk were rare at 3.7% (30/816). The data enabled a tabulation of the locations of burns as predicted by agent and mechanism of injury. The location of the burn was most strongly influenced by mechanism.Burns from (p<0.01), caused by mechanisms (p=0.01), burns (p<0.001) and burns to the (p<0.001) were significantly more common among the children referred for CP assessment.

Conclusions: By overlaying agent, mechanism and site it was possible to tabulate and quantify simple narratives of accidental contact burns in population of young children. These findings have the potential to aid clinicians in recognising accidental contact burns.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/archdischild-2019-318140DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

contact burns
4
burns influence
4
influence agents
4
agents mechanisms
4
mechanisms injury
4
injury anatomical
4
anatomical burn
4
burn locations
4
locations children
4
contact
1

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!