A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3122
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

Differential recovery rates of fitness following U.S. Army Ranger training. | LitMetric

Differential recovery rates of fitness following U.S. Army Ranger training.

J Sci Med Sport

Department of Sports Medicine and Nutrition, Neuromuscular Research Laboratory & Warrior Human Performance Research Center, University of Pittsburgh, United States.

Published: May 2020

Objectives: To investigate tactically-related physical performance and body composition recovery following U.S. Army Ranger training.

Design: Prospective cohort.

Methods: Physical performance was comprehensively assessed using a tactically-related performance battery (i.e., Ranger Athlete Warrior assessment) in 10 male Soldiers at baseline (BL) two-weeks (P1), and six-weeks (P2) post-Ranger School. Body composition was determined using DXA. A one-way repeated measures ANOVA was used followed by Bonferroni-adjusted pairwise comparisons when group differences existed (p≤0.05). Pearson correlation coefficients were used to establish associations between changes in fitness and body composition.

Results: All performance domains except the bench press and deadlift worsened following training. Speed/mobility (Illinois agility test, seconds - BL: 16.20±0.86 vs. P2: 18.66±2.09), anaerobic capacity (300-yard shuttle run, seconds - BL: 62.95±6.17 vs. P2: 67.23±5.91), core strength (heel clap, repetitions - BL: 15.80±4.08 vs. P2: 11.50±4.95), and aerobic endurance (beep test, stage - BL: 9.95±2.18 vs. P2: 7.55±1.07) had not recovered by P2. Only upper body muscular endurance and strength (metronome push-up and pull-up, respectively) were similar to BL by P2. Percent body fat increased from 15.62±3.94 (BL) to 19.33±2.99 (P2) (p<0.001). There were no significant associations between changes in body composition and performance.

Conclusions: A comprehensive characterization of physical performance and body composition revealed Rangers did not experience full recovery of fitness six weeks after training. Optimal recovery strategies are needed to return Soldiers to a state of readiness following arduous training.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jsams.2019.12.010DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

army ranger
8
physical performance
8
body composition
8
body
5
differential recovery
4
recovery rates
4
rates fitness
4
fitness army
4
ranger training
4
training objectives
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!