Purpose: Achieving therapeutic levels of phenytoin is critical to its efficacy and safety. Free serum levels represent pharmacologically active phenytoin due to the high protein binding of the drug. Predicting free serum levels in patients with left ventricular support devices can be challenging, as the pharmacokinetics (PK) can be significantly altered, and equations to correct total levels have not been validated in this population. The aim of this case series was to describe serum phenytoin concentrations in critically ill patients requiring left ventricular support devices.

Methods: A retrospective chart review was performed including patients who received phenytoin therapy and had at least 1 set of simultaneously measured free and total serum phenytoin levels during left ventricular support with a mechanical device. Corrected total phenytoin levels were calculated using Sheiner-Tozer equations.

Results: Three patients were included in this case series. Patients 1 and 2 required venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) during phenytoin therapy, and patient 3 had a durable left ventricular assist device (LVAD). Measured phenytoin levels ranged from 4.1 to 11.4 µg/mL, and calculated corrected levels were 6.8 to 18.4. Measured free phenytoin levels ranged from 1.2 to 3.6 µg/mL, which correlated with free fractions of 15.8% to 37.9%.

Conclusion: This case series demonstrates a higher percentage of free phenytoin compared to the total serum level than would be predicted and an inability to rely on corrected total phenytoin level to predict whether it is within therapeutic range. Monitoring of free serum phenytoin concentrations should be strongly considered in critically ill patients requiring LVAD or ECMO support.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0897190019894424DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

left ventricular
20
ventricular support
16
case series
16
phenytoin levels
16
phenytoin
13
free serum
12
serum phenytoin
12
levels
9
patients left
8
support devices
8

Similar Publications

In 2017, Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO) published a Clinical Practice Guideline Update for the Diagnosis, Evaluation, Prevention, and Treatment of Chronic Kidney Disease-Mineral and Bone Disorder (CKD-MBD). Since then, new lines of evidence have been published related to evaluating disordered mineral metabolism and bone quality and turnover, identifying and inhibiting vascular calcification, targeting vitamin D levels, and regulating parathyroid hormone. For an in-depth consideration of the new insights, in October 2023, KDIGO held a Controversies Conference on CKD-MBD: Progress and Knowledge Gaps Toward Personalizing Care.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most prevalent arrhythmia encountered in clinical practice. Triglyceride glucose index (Tyg), a convenient evaluation variable for insulin resistance, has shown associations with adverse cardiovascular outcomes. However, studies on the Tyg index's predictive value for adverse prognosis in patients with AF without diabetes are lacking.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

This study investigated the correlation between quantitative echocardiographic characteristics within 3 days of birth and necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC) and its severity in preterm infants. A retrospective study was conducted on 168 preterm infants with a gestational age of < 34 weeks. Patients were categorized into NEC and non-NEC groups.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: The benefit of mechanical circulatory support (MCS) with Impella (Abiomed, Inc, Danvers, MA) for patients undergoing non-emergent, high-risk percutaneous coronary intervention (HR-PCI) is unclear and currently the subject of a large randomized clinical trial (RCT), PROTECT IV. While contemporary registry data from PROTECT III demonstrated improvement of outcomes with Impella when compared with historical data (PROTECT II), there is lack of direct comparison to the HR-PCI cohort that did not receive Impella support.

Methods: We retrospectively identified patients from our institution meeting PROTECT III inclusion criteria (left ventricular ejection fraction [LVEF] <35% with unprotected left main or last remaining vessel or LVEF <30% undergoing multivessel PCI), and compared this group (NonIMP) to the published outcomes data from the PROTECT III registry (IMP).

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!