When incorporating the environment into mental processing (cf., cognitive offloading), one creates novel cognitive strategies that have the potential to improve task performance. Improved performance can, for example, mean faster problem solving, more accurate solutions, or even higher grades at university. Although cognitive offloading has frequently been associated with improved performance, it is yet unclear how flexible problem solvers are at matching their offloading habits with their current performance goals (can people improve goal-related instead of generic performance, e.g., when being in a hurry and aiming for a "quick and dirty" solution?). Here, we asked participants to solve a cognitive task, provided them with different goals-maximizing speed (SPD) or accuracy (ACC), respectively-and measured how frequently (Experiment 1) and how proficiently (Experiment 2) they made use of a novel external resource to support their cognitive processing. Experiment 1 showed that offloading behavior varied with goals: Participants offloaded less in the SPD than in the ACC condition. Experiment 2 showed that this differential offloading behavior was associated with high goal-related performance: fast answers in the SPD, accurate answers in the ACC condition. Simultaneously, goal-unrelated performance was sacrificed: inaccurate answers in the SPD, slow answers in the ACC condition. The findings support the notion of humans as canny offloaders who are able to successfully incorporate their environment in pursuit of their current cognitive goals. Future efforts should be focused on the finding's generalizability, for example, to settings without feedback or with high mental workload.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
|---|---|
| http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/cogs.12802 | DOI Listing |
Publication Analysis
Top Keywords
Similar Publications
The development of social offloading.
J Exp Child Psychol
January 2025
School of Psychology, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, St Lucia, QLD 4072, Australia.
Across two experiments, we explored the conditions under which 4- to 11-year-old children (N = 138) were more likely to seek social cognitive helpers and whether they preferentially relied on help from those that had previously shown proficiency in a relevant cognitive context. Children completed a memory task with varying levels of difficulty, after which they were introduced to two characters that exhibited either a high memory ability (task-relevant) or a high motor skill ability (task-irrelevant) in a distinct context. Children then completed the memory task a second time with the option to choose one of the two characters to assist them.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFMy Tablet's About to Go Dead! 5- to 6-year-old Children Adjust Their Cognitive Strategies Depending on Whether An External Resource is Reliably Available.
Cogn Dev
January 2025
Department of Psychology, University of Massachusetts Boston, 100 Morrissey Blvd., Boston, MA, 02125, USA.
There are concerns that reliance on external resources (e.g., information on digital devices) may be harmful to our own internal memory.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFTime Dependent Effects of Cerebellar tDCS on Cerebello-cortical Connectivity Networks in Young Adults.
Cerebellum
January 2025
Department of Psychological and Brain Sciences, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX, USA.
The cerebellum is involved in non-motor processing, supported by topographically distinct cerebellar activations and closed-loop circuits between the cerebellum and the cortex. Disruptions to cerebellar function may negatively impact prefrontal function and processing. Cerebellar resources may be important for offloading cortical processing, providing crucial scaffolding for normative performance and function.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFCognitive offloading bias in primary and secondary school students and its relationship with metacognitive monitoring.
Br J Dev Psychol
December 2024
School of Psychology, Liaoning Normal University, Dalian, China.
Article Synopsis
- Individuals use cognitive offloading, relying on external aids for memory, but may not do so effectively, leading to biases in how they use internal and external resources.
- A study tested this bias in primary and secondary school students using a word-pair memory task, finding that younger students depended more on their internal memory while older students relied too heavily on external reminders.
- The research also showed that primary school students' cognitive offloading bias was connected to how accurately they monitored their own thinking processes (metacognition).
Children's emerging ability to balance internal and external cognitive resources.
Child Dev
November 2024
School of Psychology, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.
Australian children aged 6-9 years (N = 120, 71 females; data collected in 2021-2022) were tasked with remembering the locations of 1, 3, 5, and 7 targets hidden under 25 cups on different trials. In the critical test phase, children were provided with a limited number of tokens to allocate across trials, which they could use to mark target locations and assist future memory performance. Following the search period, children were invited to adjust their previous token allocation.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFWant AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!