Objectives: The objective of this study was to compare the results of two methods for sparing the pronator quadratus in volar plating of distal radius fractures.

Methods: A total of 110 patients were randomized to volar plating with sparing of the pronator quadratus either by a transverse incision along the distal border of the pronator quadratus (Group A, 55 people) or by the brachioradialis splitting method (Group B, 55 people). The operative and radiation time, range of motion, grip strength, Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (DASH) scores, Visual Analog Scale (VAS) scores, and complications were recorded.

Results: There were no significant differences in the mean operative time, radiation time, mean bone union time, or total complication rate between the groups. We found no significant differences in range of motion, grip strength, VAS scores, and DASH scores at any of the study intervals between the groups. Although neurapraxia of the superficial branch of the radial nerve was more common in Group B than in Group A (6.7% vs. 0%), the difference was not significant.

Conclusions: Both methods were efficient approaches for sparing the pronator quadratus and had similar clinical outcomes, but they had different indications.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7459187PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0300060519893851DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

pronator quadratus
20
sparing pronator
16
volar plating
12
quadratus volar
8
plating distal
8
distal radius
8
group people
8
radiation time
8
range motion
8
motion grip
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!