AI Article Synopsis

  • - The study aims to validate a new algorithm that detects asynchronies in patient-ventilator interactions, particularly focusing on reverse-triggering (RT) in ARDS patients.
  • - The algorithm classifies breaths into categories like normal, RT (with/without breath stacking), and double-triggering, using data from two sets of breath recordings: one analyzed visually using esophageal pressure signals and the other through expert opinion on flow and airway pressure.
  • - Results show high diagnostic accuracy (0.92 and 0.96) and strong agreement with expert evaluations, indicating the algorithm is effective in identifying clinically significant asynchronies related to RT.

Article Abstract

Asynchrony due to reverse-triggering (RT) may appear in ARDS patients. The objective of this study is to validate an algorithm developed to detect these alterations in patient-ventilator interaction. We developed an algorithm that uses flow and airway pressure signals to classify breaths as normal, RT with or without breath stacking (BS) and patient initiated double-triggering (DT). The diagnostic performance of the algorithm was validated using two datasets of breaths, that are classified as stated above. The first dataset classification was based on visual inspection of esophageal pressure (Pes) signal from 699 breaths recorded from 11 ARDS patients. The other classification was obtained by vote of a group of 7 experts (2 physicians and 5 respiratory therapists, who were trained in ICU), who evaluated 1881 breaths gathered from recordings from 99 subjects. Experts used airway pressure and flow signals for breaths classification. The RT with or without BS represented 19% and 37% of breaths in Pes dataset while their frequency in the expert's dataset were 3% and 12%, respectively. The DT was very infrequent in both datasets. Algorithm classification accuracy was 0.92 (95% CI 0.89-0.94, P < 0.001) and 0.96 (95% CI 0.95-0.97, P < 0.001), in comparison with Pes and experts' opinion. Kappa statistics were 0.86 and 0.84, respectively. The algorithm precision, sensitivity and specificity for individual asynchronies were excellent. The algorithm yields an excellent accuracy for detecting clinically relevant asynchronies related to RT.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10877-019-00444-3DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

ards patients
12
pressure signals
8
airway pressure
8
breaths
6
automatic detection
4
detection reverse-triggering
4
reverse-triggering asynchronies
4
asynchronies mechanical
4
mechanical ventilation
4
ventilation ards
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!