Objectives: Middle third clavicle fractures have long been managed conservatively with immobilization. Some patients, especially those with completely displaced or shortened clavicle fractures are now thought to have increased risk of nonunion or symptomatic malunion. The authors performed a meta-analysis to study the incidence of nonunion and symptomatic malunion and test the hypothesis that surgical fixation of these fractures significantly lowers the risk of these complications.

Methods: A search was performed in the PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases for randomized clinical trials and quasi-experimental trials that compare outcomes of operative and nonoperative management for clavicle fractures that are fully (100%) displaced or have greater than 2 cm of shortening. Pooled patient data were used to construct forest plots for the meta-analysis.

Results: Eleven studies including 497 patients who were treated and 457 patients treated conservatively were analyzed. Patients managed operatively had significantly lower relative risk of developing nonunion [0.17 (95% confidence interval 0.08-0.33)] and symptomatic malunion [0.13 (95% confidence interval 0.05-0.37)]. Plate fixation significantly reduced the risk of nonunion, but intramedullary nail fixation did not. There was no difference in Constant-Murley or DASH scores between the 2 treatment groups or in the rate of secondary operative procedures.

Conclusions: Patients who undergo operative fixation of displaced middle-third clavicle fractures have a lower incidence of nonunion and symptomatic malunion. The clinical significance of this effect is uncertain, as functional scores were similar in both groups. Further research into the risk factors for nonunion and symptomatic malunion will be necessary to determine which patients benefit from operative fixation.

Level Of Evidence: Therapeutic Level II. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/BOT.0000000000001602DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

clavicle fractures
20
symptomatic malunion
20
nonunion symptomatic
16
middle-third clavicle
8
risk nonunion
8
incidence nonunion
8
patients treated
8
95% confidence
8
confidence interval
8
fractures
6

Similar Publications

Neurovascular Complications Associated With Clavicle Fractures: A Report of Three Cases and Recommendations.

Cureus

November 2024

Department of Orthopedics, Royal Berkshire NHS Foundation Trust, Reading, GBR.

Neurovascular complications associated with clavicular shaft fractures can manifest at presentation, develop gradually over time, or potentially be iatrogenically induced. Conducting a thorough neurovascular examination and, when warranted, pursuing further investigation through modalities such as CT angiogram, MRI, and nerve conduction studies (NCS) are crucial for early diagnosis and pre-operative planning. This comprehensive approach enhances patient outcomes by facilitating timely intervention and addressing any underlying neurovascular issues associated with the fracture.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

This review addresses the neurovascular complications associated with the surgical treatment of clavicle fractures through open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF). Despite being a generally safe procedure, it can lead to severe complications including brachial plexopathy, pseudoaneurysm, arteriovenous fistulas (AVF), deep vein thrombosis (DVTs), and thoracic outlet syndrome (TOS). One significant observation, not often highlighted in previous literature, is that neurovascular complications are more common in cases involving delayed fixation, nonunion, or malunion, compared to those treated acutely.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Introduction: Clavicle fractures are routinely encountered in orthopedic clinical practice and have often been the subject of debate when it comes to optimal treatment. Clavicle fracture surgery has come a long way with excellent pre-contoured superior locking plates available for fixation. This study aimed to evaluate a cohort of patients operated for displaced mid-shaft clavicle fractures by open reduction and internal fixation using superior clavicle locking plates.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Purpose: Although open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) is the gold standard treatment for displaced midshaft clavicle fractures, recent studies have advocated for nonoperative management, citing high rates of reoperation associated with operative intervention. However, no studies have compared nonoperative management to ORIF with dual-plate fixation, which may be associated with lower rates of reoperation compared to single-plate fixation. The purpose of this study was to compare the complications and patient-reported outcomes of dual mini-fragment plate fixation to nonoperative management for displaced midshaft clavicle fractures.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Objective: What is the effect of surgical or conservative treatment on the in-hospital outcomes of patients with combined fractures of the clavicle and ribs?

Design: Retrospective cohort study.

Setting: Two level-1 trauma centers and academic teaching hospitals in Boston, Massachusetts.

Patients: All adult patients with a clavicle fracture and ≥3 rib fractures admitted from 2016 to 2021.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!