Background: No standardized written or volumetric definition exists for 'loss of domain' (LOD). This limits the utility of LOD as a morphological descriptor and as a predictor of peri- and postoperative outcomes. Consequently, our aim was to establish definitions for LOD via consensus of expert abdominal wall surgeons.
Methods: A Delphi study involving 20 internationally recognized abdominal wall reconstruction (AWR) surgeons was performed. Four written and two volumetric definitions of LOD were identified via systematic review. Panelists completed a questionnaire that suggested these definitions as standardized definitions of LOD. Consensus on a preferred term was pre-defined as achieved when selected by ≥80% of panelists. Terms scoring <20% were removed.
Results: Voting commenced August 2018 and was completed in January 2019. Written definition: During Round 1, two definitions were removed and seven new definitions were suggested, leaving nine definitions for consideration. For Round 2, panelists were asked to select all appealing definitions. Thereafter, common concepts were identified during analysis, from which the facilitators advanced a new written definition. This received 100% agreement in Round 3. Volumetric definition: Initially, panelists were evenly split, but consensus for the Sabbagh method was achieved. Panelists could not reach consensus regarding a threshold LOD value that would preclude surgery.
Conclusions: Consensus for written and volumetric definitions of LOD was achieved from 20 internationally recognized AWR surgeons. Adoption of these definitions will help standardize the use of LOD for both clinical and academic activities.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00268-019-05317-z | DOI Listing |
Pract Lab Med
November 2024
bioMérieux, Department of Research and Development for Immunoassays, Marcy-l'Étoile, France.
Introduction/objectives: Following the IFCC (The International Federation of Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine) guidelines concerning high-sensitivity cardiac troponin assays, we performed an assessment of the VIDAS® High-Sensitive Troponin I (TNHS) assay. The test was evaluated on its capacity to detect at least 50 % of healthy individuals and checked that the coefficient of variation was less than 10 % at the 99th percentile.
Methods: High-sensitivity performance was assessed by examining the limits of detection, the determination of the 99th percentile value, the evaluated imprecision at said value and the detectable results above limit of detection (LoD) in a cohort of healthy European individuals.
Environ Res
December 2024
State Key Laboratory of Trauma and Chemical Poisoning, National Institute for Occupational Health and Poison Control, Chinese Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Beijing, China; Key Laboratory of Chemical Safety and Health, National Institute for Occupational Health and Poison Control, Chinese Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Beijing, China. Electronic address:
With the soaring use of rare earth elements (REEs) worldwidely in high-technology and clean energy industries, there were growing concerns for adverse health effect from the REEs exposure. However, there is a lack of biomonitoring research concerning both urine and blood in population with definite exposure. We performed a biomonitoring study that involved 103 REEs exposed males and 110 males as non-REEs exposed controls.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFTalanta
December 2024
Chemistry Department, Federal University of Santa Catarina, 88040-900, Florianópolis, Santa Catarina, Brazil.
The unprecedented use of high-resolution continuum source molecular absorption spectrometry (HR-CS MAS) for the fractionation of organic and inorganic sulfur (S) species through monitoring the CS molecule is presented here. Two separate methods for determining organic (CS) and inorganic (CS) sulfur were developed to work sequentially. The optimized temperature program for both methodologies has two pyrolysis steps and one vaporization step (1st T: 1800 and 2T: 800 °C, and T: 2500 °C).
View Article and Find Full Text PDFThe realm of analytical chemistry continues to struggle with defining and evaluating the limit of detection in analytical methods in the sense that a multitude of definitions, criteria, caveats, and methods have been proposed, developed, and adopted across disciplines. The last decade has seen a surge in the growth of electrochemical methods and studies in the field of forensic science and forensic chemistry. While many disciplines within forensic science have established method validation guidelines, the historical and current lack of electrochemical methods within forensic laboratories throughout the United States has left a major gap in knowledge, inhibiting the adoption and utilization of electrochemistry, which may serve as a powerful tool in many subdisciplines of forensics.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFSensors (Basel)
May 2024
Institute for Life Science Technologies (ILT.NRW), OWL University of Applied Sciences and Arts, 32657 Lemgo, Germany.
To evaluate the suitability of an analytical instrument, essential figures of merit such as the limit of detection (LOD) and the limit of quantification (LOQ) can be employed. However, as the definitions k nown in the literature are mostly applicable to one signal per sample, estimating the LOD for substances with instruments yielding multidimensional results like electronic noses (eNoses) is still challenging. In this paper, we will compare and present different approaches to estimate the LOD for eNoses by employing commonly used multivariate data analysis and regression techniques, including principal component analysis (PCA), principal component regression (PCR), as well as partial least squares regression (PLSR).
View Article and Find Full Text PDFEnter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!