Objective: The utility of calcium, magnesium and phosphate measurement in the ED is limited. We aimed to determine clinical risk variables for abnormal levels of these electrolytes in order to inform the development of an ordering guideline.
Methods: We performed a retrospective, observational study of patients who presented to a tertiary referral ED between January and June 2017. Adult patients who had serum calcium, magnesium or phosphate tests completed during their ED stay were included. Presenting symptoms and signs, comorbidities, medication use and laboratory values were extracted from the medical record. Patients with missing data items were excluded. Logistic regression models determined clinical risk variables associated with low and high levels of each electrolyte.
Results: A total of 33 120 adults presented during the study period. Of the 1679 calcium, 1576 magnesium and 1511 phosphate tests, 228 (13.6%), 158 (10.0%) and 387 (25.6%) were abnormal, respectively. Significant risk variables (P < 0.05) for abnormal levels were: hypocalcaemia - vomiting, perioral numbness, hand/foot spasm, calcium and phosphate supplements and chemotherapy (odds ratio [OR] range 5.9-17.3); hypercalcaemia - female sex, vomiting, polyuria, confusion, hyperparathyroidism, cancer and type 1 diabetes (OR range 2.3-9.7); hypomagnesemia - female sex, proton pump inhibitor use, tacrolimus use, alcohol abuse and type 2 diabetes (OR range 2.2-13.1); hypermagnesemia - lethargy, thiazide use and chronic kidney disease (OR range 4.3-4.5); hypophosphatemia - nausea, seizure and glucocorticoid use (OR range 1.7-2.1); and hyperphosphataemia - polyuria, diuretics and chronic kidney disease (OR range 1.9-5.0).
Conclusion: A range of demographic, comorbid, medication and clinical variables are associated with abnormal calcium, magnesium and phosphate levels. These findings will inform the development of clinical guidelines to rationalise calcium, magnesium and phosphate testing. Justification may be required for testing patients with no risk variables.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1742-6723.13411 | DOI Listing |
Front Cell Infect Microbiol
December 2024
School of Public Health, Shandong First Medical University & Shandong Academy of Medical Sciences, Jinan, China.
Background: Atmospheric ozone is a common air pollutant with known impacts on maternal and fetal health. However, the relationship between gestational ozone exposure and susceptibility to respirovirus infection remains unclear. This study aims to assess the association between longitudinal ozone exposure during pregnancy and COVID-19 risk in late gestation.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFFront Med (Lausanne)
December 2024
Department of Emergency Medicine, American University of Beirut Medical Center, Beirut, Lebanon.
Background: Trauma remains a global health issue being one of the leading causes of death worldwide. Sepsis and infections are common complications contributing to mortality, emphasizing the need to understand factors leading to such complications following trauma.
Aim: This study aimed to identify risk factors associated with post-trauma sepsis using data from the National Trauma Data Bank (NTDB).
Ann Gastroenterol Surg
January 2025
Department of Surgery, Transplantation and Gastroenterology Semmelweis University Budapest Hungary.
Background: The prevalence of ulcerative colitis (UC) is around 200/100 000 people. Colectomy is required in 7.5%-40% of patients and 58.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFIntroduction: Anthropometric, demographic, genetic, and clinical features may affect cognitive, behavioral, and functional decline, while clinical trials seldom consider minimal clinically important differences (MCIDs) in their analyses.
Methods: MCIDs were reviewed taking into account features that may affect cognitive, behavioral, or functional decline in clinical trials of new disease-modifying therapies.
Results: The higher the number of comparisons of different confounders in statistical analyses, the lower values will be significant.
Iran J Nurs Midwifery Res
November 2024
Behavioral Sciences Research Center, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran.
Background: Healthcare workers are the first to be exposed to the virus and are at greater risk than the general public. This study aimed to examine the risk factors that affected hospital staff's general health during the COVID-19 pandemic in Isfahan, Iran.
Materials And Methods: This cross-sectional study was conducted on the staff of all hospitals in Isfahan one year after the COVID-19 outbreak (2021-2022).
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!