Eur Spine J
Department of Medical Research and Management for Musculoskeletal Pain, 22nd Century Medical and Research Center, Faculty of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, 7-3-1 Hongo, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo, 113-8655, Japan.
Published: June 2020
Purpose: To investigate the psychometric properties of the Japanese version of the Core Outcome Measures Index-Back (COMI-Back), only recently published according to the established linguistic and cultural conversion guidelines, in patients undergoing spine surgery.
Methods: We recruited 145 patients who underwent thoracic or lumbar spine surgery in one of the five specific tertiary care institutions. They were asked to complete a booklet questionnaire (the COMI-Back, the Numerical Rating Scale for pain, the Short Form-12, Euro-QOL-5 dimensions, and Oswestry Disability Index) at baseline and 12 months postoperatively to investigate floor/ceiling effect, construct validity, and postoperative responsiveness. The patients were also asked to answer an anchor question (Global Treatment Outcome) to analyze the minimum clinically important difference (MCID) by receiver operating characteristics curves. Of the 145 patients, 112 completed the study. Another group of 59 volunteers with chronic symptoms completed the questionnaire twice within a 7-14-day interval for the test-retest reproducibility.
Results: The COMI summary score displayed no notable floor or ceiling effects. Except for symptom-specific well-being, the individual COMI domains and the COMI summary score correlated as expected with the scores of the chosen reference measures (ρ = 0.4-0.8). A similar trend was observed between the pre-/postoperative changes in the COMI score and those in the reference measures. The MCID for the COMI summary score was 2.5. The intraclass correlation coefficient and minimum detectable change (MDC95%) were 0.93 and 1.26, respectively.
Conclusion: The Japanese COMI-Back was a reliable and responsive questionnaire in our Japanese patients undergoing thoracic/lumbar spine surgery. These slides can be retrieved under Electronic Supplementary Material.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00586-019-06249-x | DOI Listing |
Global Spine J
March 2025
Department of Neurological Surgery, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR, USA.
Study DesignA retrospective cohort utilizing the PearlDiver Patient Claims Database.ObjectiveCervical disc arthroplasty (CDA) is accepted treatment for cervical radiculopathy; however, it may also be safe and effective in myelopathy. Thus, we compared clinical characteristics and outcomes in patients undergoing CDA and anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) for degenerative cervical myelopathy (DCM) specifically.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFClin Spine Surg
March 2025
NYU Langone Health Department of Orthopedic Surgery, New York, NY.
Study Design: Retrospective analysis of retrospectively collected data.
Objective: To determine the effects of preoperative nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID) use on estimated blood loss (EBL) and postoperative drain output in TLIF procedures.
Summary Of Background Data: Current standards of care recommend patients prescribed NSAIDs for chronic lower back pain discontinue NSAIDs at least 1 week before spine fusion surgery.
Clin Spine Surg
March 2025
Department of Orthopedics, Tangdu Hospital, Air Force Medical University, Xi'an, China.
Study Design: A meta-analysis.
Objective: To evaluate the impact of anterior versus posterior surgical approaches on outcomes in MCSM.
Background: Multilevel cervical spondylotic myelopathy (MCSM) is the most common cause of spinal cord dysfunction, and the clinical effectiveness of anterior versus posterior surgical approaches remains elusive.
Clin Spine Surg
March 2025
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Columbia University Medical Center, The Spine Hospital at New York Presbyterian, New York, NY.
Study Design: Single-center retrospective analysis.
Objective: To establish an empirically derived threshold to define both coronal and sagittal malalignment (CM & SM) based on preoperative patient-reported outcomes (PROs).
Summary Of Background Data: Currently, no radiographic alignment threshold defines preoperative CM in adult spinal deformity (ASD) patients based on disability.
Clin Spine Surg
March 2025
Department of Orthopedics, Brown University, East Providence, RI.
Study Design: Retrospective cohort study.
Objective: This study aims to evaluate the impact of body mass index (BMI) on postoperative outcomes following anterior, extreme lateral, and oblique lumbar interbody fusion (A/X/OLIF).
Background: Obesity is an increasingly common comorbidity among spine surgery patients, potentially leading to elevated postoperative complications.
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!
© LitMetric 2025. All rights reserved.