Study Objective: To show the safety and feasibility of laparoscopic sacrohysteropexy for treating uterine prolapse.
Design: An educational video to explain the laparoscopic steps of this procedure by focusing on the main anatomic landmarks and on tips and tricks to avoid complications.
Setting: A tertiary care university hospital.
Interventions: Laparoscopic sacropexy with uterus preservation for grade 3 apical defect.
Conclusion: This video shows a stepwise approach to laparoscopic sacrohysteropexy demonstrating its feasibility and safety. There is a wide choice of surgical procedures and approaches focused on pelvic organ prolapse repair. Since many years, uterine prolapse has been an indication for hysterectomy, regardless of the occurrence of uterine disease and patients' desires. With the introduction of minimally invasive surgery, the uterine-sparing procedures are being increasingly taken into account, especially in young women [1]. Sacrohysteropexy is a uterus-sparing procedure that allows for a reduction in operating time, intraoperative blood loss, mesh-related complications, and surgical costs [2]. Furthermore, this technique has a high success rate with an objective cure rate of 100% for the apical compartment and 80% for all compartments and does not seem to increase the pelvic organ prolapse recurrence rate [3]. Sacropexy is not a life-threatening procedure, but its main objective is to restore functional anatomy with the primary goal of improvement in patient's quality of life. Moreove, no difference has been found with or without uterus preservation in term of postoperative recurrence rate or ent's quality of life [4]. However, high patient satisfaction has been recently reported; therefore, uterine preservation should be considered during patient's counseling.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jmig.2019.12.006 | DOI Listing |
Int Urogynecol J
December 2024
Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Monash University, Clayton, VIC, 3168, Australia.
Introduction And Hypothesis: Autologous fascia lata has been increasingly utilised in pelvic floor reconstructive surgeries such as sacrocolpopexy and sacrohysteropexy. This case highlights sacrohysteropexy with autologous fascia lata as a promising option for women with advanced uterovaginal prolapse who wish to preserve their uterus and avoid synthetic mesh.
Methods: We report the case of a 65-year-old woman with stage 3 pelvic organ prolapse following one forceps and one spontaneous vaginal delivery.
Neurourol Urodyn
December 2024
Department of Orthopedics, Hokusuikai Kinen Hospital, Ibaraki, Japan.
Objectives: Failures and complications associated with treatments comprising laparoscopic sacrohysteropexy (SHP) for advanced pelvic organ prolapse (POP) are unclear. We compared failure rates associated with SHP and laparoscopic supracervical hysterectomy (SCH)/sacrocolpopexy (SCP) for advanced POP to determine whether they differed.
Methods: Clinical data of patients who underwent SHP (n = 52) and SCH/SCP (n = 209) were retrospectively examined.
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol
December 2024
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Kocaeli University, School of Medicine, Kocaeli, Turkey.
Objective: We aimed to investigate the effectiveness of the laparoscopic pectopexy procedure in women who want to preserve their uterus for stage III or IV apical prolapse.
Study Design: 132 women who underwent laparoscopic pectopexy due to stage III or IV apical pelvic organ prolapse (POP) were included in this study. Demographic data of the patients, duration of surgery, blood loss, hospitalisation, intraoperative and postoperative complications, recurrence rate were searched from the hospital file archive.
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol
December 2024
Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Assisted Reproduction, Hospital Universitari Dexeus, Barcelona, Spain.
Objective: To provide a description of laparoscopic approach to correct pelvic organ prolapses and evaluate the risk factors associated with the prolapse recurrence.
Study Design: We retrospectively analyzed 418 patients with symptomatic pelvic organ prolapse who underwent a laparoscopic reparation at our university center from 2010 to 2020. Prolapses were assessed by Baden-Walker system (stage I-IV).
Int J Gynaecol Obstet
September 2024
Medical Area Department (DAME), in Department of Medicine (DMED), University of Udine, Udine, Italy.
Background: Literature is lacking strong evidence about comparisons of efficacy and quality of life-related outcomes between laparoscopic total and/or supracervical hysterectomy (LTH/LSCH) with laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy (LSC) and minimally invasive sacrohysteropexy (LSH).
Objective: To summarize and compare available data on this topic providing a useful clinical tool in the treatment decision process.
Search Strategy: We performed a systematic research of PubMed (MEDLINE), Web of Science, and Gooogle Scholar.
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!