Intracranial atherosclerotic disease (ICAD) is considered a major cause of recurrent cerebrovascular events. ICAD continues to be a disease without an effective method of reducing the risk of recurrent stroke and death, even with aggressive, highly monitored medical treatment. We reviewed data from three randomized controlled studies that published data comparing intracranial stenting vs. medical treatment for symptomatic severe-ICAD. Ethnic, demographic, clinical, and procedural differences were observed among the data from these trials that might influence their results. Future research should aim at establishing refined selection criteria that can identify high-risk ICAD patients who may benefit from intracranial stenting.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6884030PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2019.01248DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

intracranial stenting
12
medical treatment
8
intracranial
5
stenting option
4
option treatment
4
treatment patients
4
patients intracranial
4
intracranial atherosclerosis?
4
atherosclerosis? intracranial
4
intracranial atherosclerotic
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!