The effectiveness and safety of posterior scleral reinforcement with vitrectomy for myopic foveoschisis treatment: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Purpose: To investigate the effectiveness and safety of posterior scleral reinforcement (PSR) combined with vitrectomy for myopic foveoschisis (MF) treatment.

Methods: We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis. We evaluated the improvement of best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) in logMAR unit, the percentage of patients with improved or stabled BCVA, benefit on axial length (AL), the retinal reattachment rate, the macular hole (MH) closure rate, as well as the complication rate.

Results: Fourteen studies (311 eyes) were included. Overall, patients' BCVA improved - 0.46 (95% confidence interval [CI] - 0.52, - 0.40) logMAR unit, with 80% (95%CI 74%, 85%) benefiting from BCVA improvement and 6% (95%CI 3%, 10%) suffering from BCVA loss. Patients' AL was shortened by - 1.74 (95%CI - 2.92, - 0.57) mm, and for patients whose AL was ≥ 30 mm, the average benefit reached - 3.68 (95%CI - 4.59, - 2.77) mm. Ninety-three percent (95%CI 89%, 96%) of the patients achieved retinal reattachment, and 65% (95%CI 47%, 80%) of the MH was closed. Patients' central foveal thickness decreased; the MD was - 187.32 (95%CI - 206.25, - 168.40) mm. The pooled complication rate was 9% (95%CI 8%, 19%), with extrusion, choroidal atrophy, and choroidal neovascularization being the most common complications. Subgroup analysis indicated no statistical difference in BCVA improvement, AL change, retinal reattachment rate, and complication rate between patients with or without MH. Subgroup analysis indicated no statistical difference in the above four outcomes between the primary and the recurrent patients either. There was no statistical difference in the above four outcomes no matter ILM peeling was combined or not.

Conclusion: PSR combined with vitrectomy helps improve 80% MF patients' BCVA; the average benefit on BCVA is - 0.46 logMAR unit. The average change in AL is - 1.74 mm; patients with AL ≥ 30 mm benefit much more than the patients with AL < 30 mm. The retinal reattachment rate is up to 93%; the MH closure rate is 65%. About 9% patients will suffer from extrusion, choroidal atrophy, choroidal neovascularization, and other complications. The outcomes were not influenced by presence of MH, disease recurrence, or ILM peeling.