Aim: The optimal placement of the endotracheal tube (ETT) in ventilated infants is essential, but birthweight may be not the best parameter to predict it. The aim of this study was a direct comparison of shoulder-umbilical length (experimental group) versus birthweight (control group) as predictor of optimal ETT placement in Malaysian ventilated infants.

Methods: All infants requiring ventilation in the neonatal intensive care unit of a tertiary hospital in Malaysia during the 4-month study period were eligible to enter this randomised controlled trial. All participants were randomised into two groups: experimental and control group. The main outcome measure was malposition of the ETT (requiring adjustment), as seen on the chest X-ray performed within 1 h after intubation. Tube placement was assessed by two neonatologists, blinded to the allocation.

Results: One hundred and ten infants were randomised, 55 in each group. The ETT was malpositioned in 13 of 55 infants (23%) for the experimental group and 22 of 55 infants (40%) in the control group (P = 0.06).

Conclusion: In the experimental group, fewer infants showed a need for tube adjustment than in the control group. While a larger study may be necessary to show statistical significance, the difference shown in this study may be large enough to be of clinical significance.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jpc.14705DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

control group
16
experimental group
12
randomised controlled
8
controlled trial
8
endotracheal tube
8
ventilated infants
8
group
8
infants
7
randomised
4
trial shoulder-umbilicus
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!