Severity: Warning
Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests
Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line Number: 176
Backtrace:
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3122
Function: getPubMedXML
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword
File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once
Background Thromboembolism from nonstenosing carotid plaques may be an underrecognized cause of embolic strokes of undetermined source (ESUS). We evaluated the association between features of nonstenosing atherosclerotic plaque on computed tomographic angiography and ESUS. Methods and Results We identified consecutive acute ischemic stroke patients from 2011 to 2015 who had unilateral anterior territory infarction on brain magnetic resonance imaging and a neck computed tomographic angiography. We included ESUS cases and as controls, cardioembolic strokes. Patients with ≥50% internal carotid artery atherosclerotic stenosis ipsilateral to the stroke were excluded from this analysis. Reviewers blinded to infarct location and stroke cause retrospectively evaluated computed tomographic angiography studies for specific plaque features including thickness of the total, soft, and calcified plaque; presence of ulceration; and perivascular fat attenuation. Paired tests and McNemar's test for paired data were used to compare plaque features ipsilateral versus contralateral to the side of infarction. Ninety-one patients with ESUS or cardioembolic stroke were included in this study. Total plaque thickness was greater on the infarcted side (2.1±2.0 mm) than the contralateral side (1.2±1.5 mm) (=0.006) among ESUS cases, but not among cardioembolic cases (1.9±1.6 mm versus 1.8±1.6 mm) (=0.32). Conclusions Among ESUS cases, total plaque thickness was greater ipsilateral to the side of infarction than on the contralateral, stroke-free side. No such side-to-side differences were apparent in cardioembolic strokes. Our findings suggest that nonstenosing large-artery atherosclerotic plaques represent one underlying mechanism of ESUS.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6951053 | PMC |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/JAHA.119.014818 | DOI Listing |
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!