Purpose: This study investigated medical students' attitudes toward academic misconduct that occurs in the learning environment during the pre-clinical and clinical periods.
Methods: Third-year medical students from seven medical schools were invited to participate in this study. A total of 337 of the 557 (60.5%) students completed an inventory assessing their attitudes toward academic misconduct. The inventory covered seven factors: scientific misconduct (eight items), irresponsibility in class (six items), disrespectful behavior in patient care (five items), dishonesty in clerkship tasks (four items), free riding on group assignments (four items), irresponsibility during clerkship (two items), and cheating on examinations (one item).
Results: Medical students showed a strict attitude toward academic misconduct such as cheating on examinations and disrespectful behavior in patient care, but they showed a less rigorous attitude toward dishonesty in clerkship tasks and irresponsibility in class. There was no difference in students' attitudes toward unprofessional behaviors by gender. The graduate medical school students showed a stricter attitude toward some factors of academic misconduct than the medical college students. This difference was significant for irresponsibility in class, disrespectful behavior in patient care, and free riding on group assignments.
Conclusion: This study indicates a critical vulnerability in medical students' professionalism toward academic integrity and responsibility. Further study evidence is needed to confirm whether this professionalism lapse is confined only to this population or is pervasive in other medical schools as well.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6900343 | PMC |
http://dx.doi.org/10.3946/kjme.2019.141 | DOI Listing |
J Clin Epidemiol
January 2025
Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, London, UK.
J Clin Epidemiol
January 2025
Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Monash University, Clayton, Australia; Aberdeen Centre for Women's Health Research, School of Medicine, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK. Electronic address:
Objective: No published methods for research integrity review include both statistical techniques applied to groups of randomised trials and individual assessment of papers. We propose a method based on practical experience of investigating data integrity across the collected papers of one author or author-group.
Study Design And Setting: We report our approach to investigating the collected papers of an author or author-group suspected of academic misconduct.
BMC Med Educ
January 2025
Medical Education Department, Education Development Center, Shahid Sadoughi University of Medical Sciences, Yazd, Iran.
Aim: The present study aimed to explore the unprofessional behavior of educators, senior students, and peers in the education process of dental and oral health services.
Method: This qualitative study employed a conventional content analysis approach. The undergraduate students (n = 21) were recruited to participate in the study through purposive sampling.
J Educ Health Promot
October 2024
Department of Medical Library and Information Science, School of Allied Medical Sciences, Ahvaz Jundishapur University of Medical Sciences, Ahvaz, Iran.
Background: Academic plagiarism affects the ethical aspects of research and can be in relation with valid health information distribution. The aim of this research is designing, validating, and standardizing the plagiarism awareness questionnaire for awareness of plagiarism.
Materials And Methods: This study is cross-sectional and was done in medical sciences post-graduate students.
J Yeungnam Med Sci
December 2024
Department of Pharmacology and PharmacoGenomics Research Center, Inje University College of Medicine, Busan, Korea.
Background: Large language models (LLMs), the most recent advancements in artificial intelligence (AI), have profoundly affected academic publishing and raised important ethical and practical concerns. This study examined the prevalence and content of AI guidelines in Korean medical journals to assess the current landscape and inform future policy implementation.
Methods: The top 100 Korean medical journals determined by Hirsh index were surveyed.
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!