Purpose: This study investigated medical students' attitudes toward academic misconduct that occurs in the learning environment during the pre-clinical and clinical periods.

Methods: Third-year medical students from seven medical schools were invited to participate in this study. A total of 337 of the 557 (60.5%) students completed an inventory assessing their attitudes toward academic misconduct. The inventory covered seven factors: scientific misconduct (eight items), irresponsibility in class (six items), disrespectful behavior in patient care (five items), dishonesty in clerkship tasks (four items), free riding on group assignments (four items), irresponsibility during clerkship (two items), and cheating on examinations (one item).

Results: Medical students showed a strict attitude toward academic misconduct such as cheating on examinations and disrespectful behavior in patient care, but they showed a less rigorous attitude toward dishonesty in clerkship tasks and irresponsibility in class. There was no difference in students' attitudes toward unprofessional behaviors by gender. The graduate medical school students showed a stricter attitude toward some factors of academic misconduct than the medical college students. This difference was significant for irresponsibility in class, disrespectful behavior in patient care, and free riding on group assignments.

Conclusion: This study indicates a critical vulnerability in medical students' professionalism toward academic integrity and responsibility. Further study evidence is needed to confirm whether this professionalism lapse is confined only to this population or is pervasive in other medical schools as well.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6900343PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.3946/kjme.2019.141DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

academic misconduct
20
medical students'
12
students' attitudes
12
attitudes academic
12
irresponsibility class
12
disrespectful behavior
12
behavior patient
12
patient care
12
medical
8
medical students
8

Similar Publications

Assessing the scientific integrity of the collected work of one author or author-group.

J Clin Epidemiol

January 2025

Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Monash University, Clayton, Australia; Aberdeen Centre for Women's Health Research, School of Medicine, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK. Electronic address:

Objective: No published methods for research integrity review include both statistical techniques applied to groups of randomised trials and individual assessment of papers. We propose a method based on practical experience of investigating data integrity across the collected papers of one author or author-group.

Study Design And Setting: We report our approach to investigating the collected papers of an author or author-group suspected of academic misconduct.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Aim: The present study aimed to explore the unprofessional behavior of educators, senior students, and peers in the education process of dental and oral health services.

Method: This qualitative study employed a conventional content analysis approach. The undergraduate students (n = 21) were recruited to participate in the study through purposive sampling.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: Academic plagiarism affects the ethical aspects of research and can be in relation with valid health information distribution. The aim of this research is designing, validating, and standardizing the plagiarism awareness questionnaire for awareness of plagiarism.

Materials And Methods: This study is cross-sectional and was done in medical sciences post-graduate students.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Large language model usage guidelines in Korean medical journals: a survey using human-artificial intelligence collaboration.

J Yeungnam Med Sci

December 2024

Department of Pharmacology and PharmacoGenomics Research Center, Inje University College of Medicine, Busan, Korea.

Background: Large language models (LLMs), the most recent advancements in artificial intelligence (AI), have profoundly affected academic publishing and raised important ethical and practical concerns. This study examined the prevalence and content of AI guidelines in Korean medical journals to assess the current landscape and inform future policy implementation.

Methods: The top 100 Korean medical journals determined by Hirsh index were surveyed.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!