A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3122
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

Utility of digitally supported surgical competency assessments in a work-based setting: a systematic review of the literature. | LitMetric

Background: Adequate training and assessment of competency in surgical trainees are important in minimizing adverse events and achieving good patient outcomes. The purpose was to investigate the current literature on digitally supported methods of facilitating work-based competency assessment of surgical trainees.

Methods: Two concurrent literature searches were performed by two independent researchers using three databases: MEDLINE, Embase and Education Resources Information Center. Eligible studies reported on digitally supported tools for assessing surgical competency in a work-based setting for interns, residents or trainees of a post-graduate surgical programme. Studies focusing primarily on training courses, simulations or other tools for assessing surgical skills in a setting outside of work were excluded. Articles published as abstracts only, articles not published in English and review articles that did not contain original data were excluded.

Results: A total of 11 eligible studies were included, with six of these implementing smartphone application-based programmes, and five utilizing web-based programmes. Five studies implemented the 'System for Improving and Measuring Procedural Learning' smartphone application. Studies were based predominantly on general surgery residents, and were limited to the North American context. There was significant variability between studies regarding methodology, including the scoring system used to assess competency.

Conclusion: This review confirms that digitally supported competency assessment of surgical trainees in a work-based setting is both feasible and effective. Digital platforms allow evaluations to be performed in a timely fashion without significant disturbance to workflow.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/ans.15472DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

digitally supported
16
work-based setting
12
surgical competency
8
surgical trainees
8
competency assessment
8
assessment surgical
8
eligible studies
8
tools assessing
8
assessing surgical
8
articles published
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!