A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 1034
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3152
Function: GetPubMedArticleOutput_2016

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

The Diagnostic Accuracy and Postoperative Outcomes of Cervical Cancer Patients for MR-invisible or MR-visible Diagnosis of Combined T2- and Diffusion-weighted 3T MRI Using the External Phased-array Receiver. | LitMetric

Background/aim: This study aimed to determine the diagnostic accuracy and postoperative outcomes of early-stage cervical cancer patients [2009 FIGO stages IA2-IB1 (<2 cm)] diagnosed with magnetic resonance (MR)-invisible disease or MR-visible disease using the external phased-array receiver.

Patients And Methods: Between 2007 and 2014, 110 patients with a FIGO clinical stage IA2-IB1 (<2 cm) cervical cancer underwent primary surgical treatment after external array coil T2W and DW MR imaging following the diagnostic biopsy procedure.

Results: The median histological size of MR-invisible vs. MR-visible diagnosis was 3±6.4 mm and 16±5.2 mm. Eighty-five of the 110 patients had histologically residual tumor. The sensitivity, specificity, PPV, and NPV of tumor diagnosis were 63.5%, 92.0%, 96.4%, and 42.6%, respectively. Histological estimates of 54 (49.1%) MR-invisible vs. 56 (50.9%) MR-visible diagnoses were identified as 23 true-negative (TN) and 31 false-negative (FN) vs. 54 true-positive (TP) and 2 false-positive (FP). The recurrence-free rate was 98.1% in the MR-invisible group and 91.1% in the MR-visible group. The overall survival rates were 100% and 92.9%, respectively.

Conclusion: A preoperative MR-invisible diagnosis in early-stage cervical cancer patients led to a high probability of FN and was associated with underdiagnosis.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.21873/anticanres.13916DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

diagnostic accuracy
8
accuracy postoperative
8
postoperative outcomes
8
cervical cancer
8
cancer patients
8
outcomes cervical
4
patients mr-invisible
4
mr-invisible mr-visible
4
mr-visible diagnosis
4
diagnosis combined
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!