Background: A precise transfer of the position of an implant to the working cast is particularly important to achieve an optimal fit of the final restoration. Different variables affect the accuracy of implant impression. The purpose of the present study is to compare the accuracy of open-tray and snap-on impression techniques in implants with different angulations.
Materials And Methods: In this experimental study: A reference acrylic resin model of the mandible was fabricated. Four implants were positioned with the angles of 0°, 10°, 15°, and 25° in the model. Ten impressions were prepared with open-tray technique and ten impressions were made using snap-on technique. All impressions were made from vinyl polysiloxane impression material. Linear (Δ, Δ, and Δ) and angular displacements (Δθ) of implants were evaluated using a coordinate measuring machine. Measured data were then analyzed using two-way analysis of variance and Tukey's test (α = 0.05).
Results: The results showed that the accuracy of open-tray impression technique is significantly different from snap-on technique in Δ ( = 0.003), Δ ( = 0.000), Δ ( = 0.000), and Δθ ( = 0.000). Implants with 25° angulation are significantly less accurate than 0°, 10°, and 15° implants in Δ, Δ, Δ, and Δθ. Fifteen-degree implants are less accurate than 0° and 10° ones in Δθ.
Conclusion: Regarding the findings of this study, it can be concluded that snap-on technique is less accurate than open-tray technique, and the accuracy of 25° implant is less than that of 0°, 10°, and 15° implants.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6873238 | PMC |
J Dent
November 2008
Nagasaki University, Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, Department of Translational Medicine Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, Division of Applied Prosthodontics, 1-7-1 Sakamoto, Nagasaki City 852-8588, Japan.
Objective: The purpose of this study was to investigate the efficacy of an experimental dentin conditioner consisting of ascorbic acid (AA) and ferric chloride (Fe), in terms of micro-tensile bond strength (microTBS).
Methods: Five experimental solutions were prepared and evaluated: 10% AA and 5% Fe (10AA-5Fe); 10% AA and 0% Fe (10AA-0Fe); 0% AA and 5% Fe (0AA-5Fe); 10% citric acid and 3% ferric chloride (10-3); and, 0% AA and 0% Fe (0AA-0Fe). Flattened dentin surfaces were treated with each of the experimental solutions.
Dent Mater J
March 2005
Division of Fixed Prosthodontics and Oral Rehabilitation, Department of Developmental and Reconstructive Medicine, Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, Nagasaki University, Japan.
The purpose of this study was to investigate the efficacy of an experimental dentin primer consisting of ascorbic acid (AA) and ferric chloride (Fe). Three exprimental primers - 10 wt%AA and 0.075 wt%Fe (i.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFEnter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!