Severity: Warning
Message: file_get_contents(https://...@pubfacts.com&api_key=b8daa3ad693db53b1410957c26c9a51b4908&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests
Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line Number: 176
Backtrace:
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 1034
Function: getPubMedXML
File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3152
Function: GetPubMedArticleOutput_2016
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global
File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword
File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once
Objective: We prospectively assessed the diagnostic capacity of dynamic and dual-time-point F-fluorodeoxyglucose PET/computed tomography and explored the most appropriate scan timing for clinicopathological discrimination of non-Hodgkin's lymphoma.
Methods: Thirteen patients underwent dynamic scans dynamic scans (5-15, 15-25, and 25-35 minute postinjection) and consecutive dual-time-point scans (1- and 2-hour postinjection). For five indolent and 16 aggressive lymphomas, we statistically compared the maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax) and the retention index of the SUVmax (RI-SUVmax) for each scan and explored the diagnostic capacities using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analyses.
Results: SUVmax increased progressively over time in all lymphomas and was significantly higher for aggressive lymphoma than for indolent lymphoma in each timephase. RI-SUVmax of dynamic scans (RI-SUV-dynamic) was significantly higher in aggressive than in indolent lymphoma. The cutoff values obtained a sensitivity of 94%, positive-predictive value of 94%, and accuracy of 91% for SUVmax analyses of the dynamic second and third phases, 1-hour early phase, and 2-hour delayed phase, and a sensitivity of 88%, positive-predictive value of 93%, and accuracy of 86% for RI-SUV-dynamic. In contrast, for the dynamic first phase, the cutoff value of SUVmax yielded moderate sensitivity of 69%, a positive-predictive value of 92%, and an accuracy of 71%. The area under the ROC curve (AUC) of the RI-SUV-dynamic had the highest value (0.938), whereas the AUCs of the other ROC analyses were not significantly different.
Conclusion: The dynamic second and third phase could potentially provide good predictors of clinicopathological discrimination, as can the early and delayed phases.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MNM.0000000000001120 | DOI Listing |
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!