Refining algorithmic estimation of relative fundamental frequency: Accounting for sample characteristics and fundamental frequency estimation method.

Relative fundamental frequency (RFF) is a promising acoustic measure for evaluating voice disorders. Yet, the accuracy of the current RFF algorithm varies across a broad range of vocal signals. The authors investigated how fundamental frequency (f) estimation and sample characteristics impact the relationship between manual and semi-automated RFF estimates. Acoustic recordings were collected from 227 individuals with and 256 individuals without voice disorders. Common f estimation techniques were compared to the autocorrelation method currently implemented in the RFF algorithm. Pitch strength-based categories were constructed using a training set (1158 samples), and algorithm thresholds were tuned to each category. RFF was then computed on an independent test set (291 samples) using category-specific thresholds and compared against manual RFF via mean bias error (MBE) and root-mean-square error (RMSE). Auditory-SWIPE' for f estimation led to the greatest correspondence with manual RFF and was implemented in concert with category-specific thresholds. Refining f estimation and accounting for sample characteristics led to increased correspondence with manual RFF [MBE = 0.01 semitones (ST), RMSE = 0.28 ST] compared to the unmodified algorithm (MBE = 0.90 ST, RMSE = 0.34 ST), reducing the MBE and RMSE of semi-automated RFF estimates by 88.4% and 17.3%, respectively.