IVC filter removal after extended implantation periods.

Surgeon

Division of Interventional Radiology, University Health Network, Toronto General Hospital, Canada; Division of Vascular Surgery, University Health Network, Toronto General Hospital, Canada. Electronic address:

Published: October 2020

Objective: Life-threatening complications have been reported in patients with chronic retrievable IVC filters. National health agencies have urged hospitals to assess all patients with retrievable IVC filters for filter removal. The aim of the current study was to identify those patients with unretrieved chronic IVC filters, document complications and removal techniques.

Methods: We identified a cohort with unretrieved IVC filters inserted between January 2001 and December 2013. These patients were invited back to clinic for review with CT imaging to determine complications, if any, and offer removal. Data collected included demographics, complications and retrieval characteristics.

Results: 289 patients were discovered to still have a filter in situ. Of these, 193 patients were verified as deceased. Eighty-nine patients were notified, with no current contact information available on the remaining seven. Thirty-six attended for review, 20 females, 16 males, with an average age of 63.5 years. Complications identified at CT were 2 occluded IVCs (5.8%), 4 fractured filters (11.7%) and filter penetration in all cases (37.5% grade 2, 56.25% grade 3). Sixteen patients agreed to proceed with filter removal, 10 declined the opportunity and 6 were unfit or had ongoing indication for the filter. Two are awaiting removal and two had IVC occlusion. Subsequent retrieval was successful in 93% of cases (14/15). The mean time to removal from implant was 3846.9 days (SD 980.3). Advanced techniques were utilized in 10 cases and there were no mortalities or morbidities.

Conclusion: Retrievable inferior vena cava filters are not benign and practitioners need to be aware of regulatory guidelines. Unretrieved filters can be successfully retrieved using standard and advanced methods with low morbidity and mortality.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.surge.2019.10.003DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

ivc filters
16
filter removal
12
patients
8
retrievable ivc
8
removal
7
filters
7
ivc
6
complications
5
filter
5
ivc filter
4

Similar Publications

Intracardiac migration of inferior vena cava (IVC) filter or stent is a rare but potentially fatal complication of endovascular venous device placement. There is no consensus whether migrated stents should be surgically removed by open cardiac surgery or retrieved by the percutaneous endovascular route and whether an intervention should be performed immediately or expectantly. Herein, we report a 39-year-old female who received emergent left lobe living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) owing to posthepatectomy liver failure.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: The role of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) in the treatment of left ventricular thrombus (LVT) after ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) remains uncertain.

Aims: We aimed to compare the effect of rivaroxaban versus warfarin in patients with STEMI complicated by LVT.

Methods: Adult patients with STEMI and two-dimensional transthoracic echocardiography showing LVT were assigned to rivaroxaban (15 mg once daily) or warfarin (international normalised ratio goal of 2.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Two-year outcomes from the Cook IVC Filter (CIVC) Study.

J Vasc Interv Radiol

December 2024

Vascular Surgery, UF Health - Halifax Health, University of Florida, Daytona Beach, FL.

Purpose: Report 2-year outcomes from a prospective, multicenter, non-randomized, single-arm study designed to further assess the safety and effectiveness of the Celect and the Günther Tulip Vena Cava Filters.

Materials And Methods: The BLIND study enrolled patients requiring temporary or permanent IVC filter placement for the prevention of pulmonary embolism (PE). The primary effectiveness endpoint was the rate of technical placement success and 12-month freedom from new symptomatic PE while a filter was indwelling.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Objective: To identify risk factors for loss to follow-up after inferior vena cava (IVC) filter placement in inpatients of other departments (IODs) and to determine whether a quality improvement project launched at our institution in April 2022 improved follow-up and filter retrieval rates in these patients.

Methods: Consecutive patients who underwent retrievable filter placement at our institution between March 2021 and March 2023 were included in this study. Patients were divided into preimprovement (before April 2022; n = 81) and postimprovement (after April 2022; n = 77) groups.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!