Musculoskeletal injury quality outcome indicators for the emergency department.

Intern Emerg Med

Centre for Health Services Research, Faculty of Medicine, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD, Australia.

Published: April 2020

AI Article Synopsis

  • High standards of care for musculoskeletal injuries in emergency departments (ED) should be upheld, even with financial and performance pressures.
  • A study developed a set of meaningful and valid quality indicators (QIs) to assess and improve healthcare outcomes for these injuries, starting with a systematic review and input from experts.
  • After analyzing data from 633 patients across eight EDs, the expert panel finalized 11 QIs focusing on pain management effectiveness, discharge timeliness, and overall patient experience.

Article Abstract

High standards of care for musculoskeletal injuries presenting to emergency departments (ED) must be maintained despite financial constraints, the model of care in place, or the pressure to reach time-based performance measures. Outcome quality indicators (QIs) provide a tangible way of assessing and improving the outcomes of health-care delivery. This study aimed to develop a set of outcome QIs for musculoskeletal injuries in the ED that are meaningful, valid, feasible to collect, simple to use for clinical quality improvement and chosen by experts in the field. The study used a multi-phase mixed methods design, commencing with a systematic review of available outcome QIs. An expert panel then developed a set of preliminary QIs based on the available scientific evidence. Prospective observational data collection was undertaken across eight EDs with subsequent retrospective chart audits, follow-up phone calls and audit of administrative databases. After statistical analysis, validated results were presented to the expert panel who discussed, refined and formally voted on a final outcome QI set. A total of 41 preliminary outcome QIs were field tested in EDs, with data collected on 633 patients. Using the field study results, the expert panel voted 11 outcome QIs into the final set. These covered effectiveness of pain management, timeliness to discharge, re-presentations to the ED and unplanned visits to health professionals in the community, missed injuries, opioids side effects and the patient experience. An evidence-based set of outcome quality indicators is now available to support clinical quality improvement of musculoskeletal injury care in the ED setting.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11739-019-02234-wDOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

outcome qis
16
expert panel
12
musculoskeletal injury
8
outcome
8
musculoskeletal injuries
8
outcome quality
8
quality indicators
8
set outcome
8
clinical quality
8
quality improvement
8

Similar Publications

Background: The COVID-19 pandemic entailed a global health crisis, significantly affecting medical service delivery in Germany as well as elsewhere. While intensive care capacities were overloaded by COVID cases, not only elective cases but also non-COVID cases requiring urgent treatment unexpectedly decreased, potentially leading to a deterioration in health outcomes. However, these developments were only uncovered retrospectively.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF
Article Synopsis
  • Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is a significant health issue worldwide, contributing to high mortality rates, and is often underdiagnosed in Spain, prompting the CARABELA-COPD initiative to improve care.
  • The CARABELA-COPD initiative uses a four-phase lean methodology focusing on collaboration among various stakeholders to enhance COPD management across different healthcare settings in Spain.
  • Initial results include the development of a comprehensive patient journey, identification of key improvement areas in care, and establishment of quality indicators, aiming to transform COPD management and improve patient outcomes through interdisciplinary teamwork.
View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: Quality indicators (QIs) are used to standardize care and improve outcomes in patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH). It is important that QIs are validated within specific healthcare contexts. Therefore, this study aimed to validate QIs for PAH management in Japan using a modified Delphi consensus method.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Quality of care in hepatocellular carcinoma-A critical review.

Hepatol Commun

January 2025

Department of Gastroenterology, Alfred Hospital, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.

There is significant variation in HCC management across different centers with poor adherence to evidence-based clinical practice guidelines as assessed in prior studies. In Australia, quality indicators (QIs) have recently been proposed by a multidisciplinary group of experts to help provide a framework to assess and monitor the quality of HCC care. In this review, we discuss the many areas where real-world practice deviates from evidence-based medicine, the role that QI sets play in addressing this gap, and the similarities and differences between Australian QIs and other leading treatment guidelines and QI sets from around the world.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

International Comparison of Quality Indicators for Adults Hospitalized for Heart Failure: A Systematic Review.

Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes

November 2024

Divisions of Internal Medicine and Palliative Care, Department of Medicine, Temmy Latner Centre for Palliative Care, Sinai Health, Toronto, Ontario, Canada (G.G.A., A.A., B.S., M.M., J.M.L., S.M., K.L.Q.).

Background: There is limited international agreement on defining care quality for the millions of people hospitalized with heart failure worldwide. Our objective was to compare and measure agreement across existing internationally published quality indicators (QIs) for the care of adults hospitalized for heart failure.

Methods: Systematic review and evidence gap map of internationally published articles reporting on QIs for adults hospitalized for heart failure, using PubMed, MEDLINE, EMBASE, and TRIP from inception to July 18, 2022.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!