AI Article Synopsis

  • The study aimed to explore how early post-treatment FDG-PET scans correlate with treatment outcomes such as local, regional, and distant failure, as well as overall survival in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer treated with chemoradiotherapy.
  • Involving 47 stage IIIA-B NSCLC patients, key PET metrics like metabolic tumor volume and total lesion glycolysis were analyzed post-treatment; findings showed stronger associations between these metrics and outcomes compared to baseline metrics.
  • The results indicated that early post-treatment PET metrics are valuable for predicting outcomes, primarily for the primary tumor rather than lymph nodes, with both volumetric and intensity measures being significant.

Article Abstract

Background And Purpose: To investigate associations of early post-treatment Fluorodeoxyglucose-positron-emission-tomography (FDG-PET)-scans with local (LF), regional (RF), distant failure (DF) and overall survival (OS) in locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer (LA-NSCLC)-patients treated with concurrent chemoradiotherapy.

Materials And Methods: Forty-seven stage IIIA-B NSCLC-patients included in a randomized phase II-trial (NTR2230) received 66 Gy (24x2.75 Gy) with low dose Cisplatin +/- Cetuximab. FDG-PET-scans were performed at baseline and 4 weeks post-treatment (range, 1.6-10.1). SUV, SUV, metabolic tumor volume (MTV), total lesion glycolysis (TLG) and gross tumor volume were calculated separately for the primary tumor and the involved lymph nodes to generate baseline, post-treatment, and relative response metrics defined as (metric-metric)/metric. Univariable cox regression analyses were performed to investigate associations between PET-metrics and outcomes.

Results: Metrics resulted from the post-treatment scan and relative response were associated with outcome, but baseline metrics were not. Primary tumor metrics were stronger associated with all outcomes than lymph node metrics. Both the volumetric (TLG/MTV) and intensity (SUV/SUV) PET-metrics were associated with OS. The intensity metrics were associated with LF, while the volumetric PET-metrics were associated with RF/DF. This was in contrast to the nodal metrics, demonstrating only an association between RF and the relative response of TLG/MTV. No preference was found between PET volumetric and intensity metrics associated with outcome.

Conclusion: Early post-treatment PET-metrics are associated with treatment outcome in LA-NSCLC patients treated with chemoradiotherapy. Both volumetric and intensity PET-metrics are useful, but more for the primary tumor than for lymph nodes.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.radonc.2019.10.008DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

primary tumor
12
relative response
12
pet-metrics associated
12
local regional
8
locally advanced
8
investigate associations
8
early post-treatment
8
tumor volume
8
lymph nodes
8
metrics
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!