Effects of oxygen on post-surgical infections during an individualised perioperative open-lung ventilatory strategy: a randomised controlled trial.

Br J Anaesth

CIBER de Enfermedades Respiratorias, Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Madrid, Spain; Navarrabiomed-Fundación Miguel Servet, Red de Investigación en Servicios de Salud en Enfermedades Crónicas (REDISSEC), Pamplona, Spain; Department of Anesthesiology, Hospital Privado de Comunidad, Mar de Plata, Argentina; Department of Surgical Sciences, Hedenstierna Laboratory, Uppsala University Hospital Uppsala, Sweden; Fundación para el Fomento de la Investigación Sanitaria y Biomédica de la Comunidad Valenciana (FISABIO), Red de Investigación en Servicios de Salud en Enfermedades Crónicas (REDISSEC), Valencia, Spain; Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care, Hospital de Albacete, Spain; Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care, Hospital Universitario La Princesa, Madrid, Spain; Department of Anesthesiology, Hospital de Manises, Spain; Multidisciplinary Organ Dysfunction Evaluation Research Network, Research Unit, Hospital Universitario Dr. Negrín, Las Palmas de Gran Canaria, Spain; Keenan Research Center for Biomedical Science at the Li Ka Shing Knowledge Institute, St. Michael''s Hospital, Toronto, ON, Canada.

Published: January 2020

Background: We aimed to examine whether using a high fraction of inspired oxygen (FIO) in the context of an individualised intra- and postoperative open-lung ventilation approach could decrease surgical site infection (SSI) in patients scheduled for abdominal surgery.

Methods: We performed a multicentre, randomised controlled clinical trial in a network of 21 university hospitals from June 6, 2017 to July 19, 2018. Patients undergoing abdominal surgery were randomly assigned to receive a high (0.80) or conventional (0.3) FIO during the intraoperative period and during the first 3 postoperative hours. All patients were mechanically ventilated with an open-lung strategy, which included recruitment manoeuvres and individualised positive end-expiratory pressure for the best respiratory-system compliance, and individualised continuous postoperative airway pressure for adequate peripheral oxyhaemoglobin saturation. The primary outcome was the prevalence of SSI within the first 7 postoperative days. The secondary outcomes were composites of systemic complications, length of intensive care and hospital stay, and 6-month mortality.

Results: We enrolled 740 subjects: 371 in the high FIO group and 369 in the low FIO group. Data from 717 subjects were available for final analysis. The rate of SSI during the first postoperative week did not differ between high (8.9%) and low (9.4%) FIO groups (relative risk [RR]: 0.94; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.59-1.50; P=0.90]). Secondary outcomes, such as atelectasis (7.7% vs 9.8%; RR: 0.77; 95% CI: 0.48-1.25; P=0.38) and myocardial ischaemia (0.6% [n=2] vs 0% [n=0]; P=0.47) did not differ between groups.

Conclusions: An oxygenation strategy using high FIO compared with conventional FIO did not reduce postoperative SSIs in abdominal surgery. No differences in secondary outcomes or adverse events were found.

Clinical Trial Registration: NCT02776046.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bja.2019.10.009DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

secondary outcomes
12
randomised controlled
8
abdominal surgery
8
conventional fio
8
ssi postoperative
8
high fio
8
fio group
8
fio
7
postoperative
6
high
5

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!