Objective: The aim of this study was to evaluate the usefulness of ultrasound in pregnancies with a positive non-invasive prenatal testing (NIPT) result for trisomy 18/13.
Materials And Methods: During a four-year period, the pregnant women who were referred for invasive genetic testing because of positive NIPT results for trisomy 18/13 were included in this study. An in-depth ultrasound was done for these patients before invasive procedures. The data of fetal ultrasound and cytogenetic results were collected.
Results: There were 81 patients with a positive NIPT result for trisomy 18/13, including 39 (30 positive for trisomy 18; 9 positive for trisomy 13) within 12-14 weeks of gestation, and 42 (31 positive for trisomy 18; 11 positive for trisomy 13) within 15-22 weeks. The PPV of NIPT was 60.7% for trisomy 18, and 30% for trisomy 13, respectively. When adding ultrasound to NIPT, the new PPV for trisomy 18 was 100%, and the negative predictive value (NPV) was 92.3%, with a NPV of 85.7% in the first trimester and a NPV of 100% in the second trimester, respectively. The new PPV and NPV for trisomy 13 were 100% and 100%, respectively.
Conclusion: By adding ultrasound to the NIPT, we achieved much higher PPVs and NPVs for trisomy 18/13. A normal scan can help to alleviate stress in parents caused by false positive NIPT results.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tjog.2019.09.012 | DOI Listing |
Prenat Diagn
January 2025
Discipline of Women's Health, University of New South Wales, Randwick, Australia.
Introduction: Genome-wide non-invasive prenatal testing (gwNIPT) has screening limitations for detectable genetic conditions and cannot detect microdeletions/microduplications (MD) or triploidy. Nuchal translucency (NT) increases with gestation and with genetic or structural abnormalities. This study aims to determine the utility of NT measurement in detecting genetic abnormalities not identified by gwNIPT and the optimal NT threshold value.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFMol Cytogenet
December 2024
Department of Medical Genetics, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
The advent of non-invasive prenatal testing (NIPT) in the screening of fetal abnormalities has optimized prenatal care and decreased the rate of invasive diagnostic tests. In this retrospective descriptive study, we began with 1874 singleton pregnancies. After exclusion of some cases, the study cohort ended up with 1674 cases.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFGenes (Basel)
November 2024
AMES, Polidiagnostic Strumental Centre, Srl, 80013 Naples, Italy.
Front Genet
November 2024
The College of Life Sciences, Northwest University, Xi'an City, Shanxi, China.
Introduction: Karyotyping and chromosome microarray analysis (CMA) are the two main prenatal diagnostic techniques currently used for genetic testing. We aimed to evaluate the value of chromosomal karyotyping and CMA for different prenatal indications.
Methods: A total of 2084 amniocentesis samples from pregnant women who underwent prenatal diagnosis from 16 to 22 + 6 weeks of gestation between January 2021 and December 2022 were retrospectively collected.
Arch Gynecol Obstet
December 2024
Prenatal Diagnosis Center, Guizhou Provincial People's Hospital, 83 Zhongshan East Rd., Guiyang, 550002, China.
Objective: This study evaluated the accuracy of non-invasive prenatal testing (NIPT-SGDs) for dominant monogenic genetic diseases associated with fetal structural abnormalities and to assess the feasibility of clinical application.
Methods: Pregnant women requiring prenatal diagnosis due to fetal structural abnormalities were enrolled. Maternal peripheral blood was analyzed for cell-free DNA (cfDNA) using coordinative allele-aware target enrichment sequencing (COATE-seq).
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!