Background: Cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) pressure measurement is routinely performed via a conventional water column manometer. There is increasing interest in using a digital manometer in measuring CSF pressures. The aim of this study is to compare column and digital manometers, in addition to measuring time to acquire the pressure readings.

Research Design And Methods: This prospective study included 27 patients who were referred for a fluoroscopically guided lumbar puncture. Opening pressure and closing pressure measurements were done with a digital manometer and then a traditional water column manometer. The time to obtain each pressure measurement was also recorded and compared.

Results: Mean time to obtain pressure reading was significantly lower in the digital manometer group when compared to the water column manometer group (8.1 seconds vs. 42.2 seconds, P<0.05 for opening pressure and 8.92 seconds vs. 45.15 seconds, P<0.05 for closing pressure). Correlation between the opening pressure measurements (Pearson coefficient r= 0.98) and closing pressure (Pearson coefficient r= 0.89) was strong. However, the digital manometer reading consistently read higher.

Conclusion: Digital manometry during an LP yielded is faster however there might be a clinical difference between the devices. Clinicians must be careful in using the device across all cases.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6825514PMC
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/MDER.S225757DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

digital manometer
16
water column
16
column manometer
16
manometer
8
lumbar puncture
8
pressure measurement
8
time pressure
8
manometer group
8
pressure
6
column
5

Similar Publications

Background: Diaphragm dysfunction is prevalent among individuals with asthma due to lung hyperinflation and hyperventilation in asthma paroxysm. This study was designed to evaluate the effect of the manual diaphragm release technique (MDRT) on diaphragm function in individuals with asthma.

Methods: Adults with diagnosed stable asthma (n = 24), will be recruited from the General Hospital of Kifissia "Agioi Anargyroi" in Athens, Greece.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

New Protocol for Evaluating Maximum Inspiratory Pressure: Concurrent Validity and Test-Retest Reliability.

Phys Ther

November 2024

Department of Radiology, Rehabilitation and Physiotherapy, Faculty of Nursing, Physiotherapy and Podiatry, Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria del Hospital Clínico San Carlos (IdISSC), Complutense University of Madrid, Madrid, Spain.

Objective: The purpose of this study was to validate a maximum inspiratory pressure (MIP) test protocol based on the principles of the 1-repetition maximum (1RM) test, assess its test-retest reliability, and establish minimal detectable change (MDC) in individuals with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD).

Methods: Forty-nine individuals with COPD were included in the study, of whom 44 individuals attended 2 appointments separated by 7 to 10 days for test-retest reliability. The MIP test was performed using a threshold valve device (1RM-based protocol) and the digital manometer (reference test).

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Objective(s): The objective of this study was to characterize the level of agreement between three manometers: (1) Iowa Oral Performance Instrument (IOPI)-the reference standard for tongue, lip, and cheek strength assessments; (2) MicroRPM Respiratory Pressure Meter (MicroRPM)-the reference standard for respiratory strength assessments; and (3) Digital Pressure Manometer (DPM)-an alternative, low-cost pressure testing manometer.

Methods: Manual pressures were simultaneously applied to the IOPI and DPM, and to the MicroRPM and DPM, within a controlled laboratory setting. Agreement in pressure readings were analyzed using descriptive statistics, Lin's concordance correlation, and Bland-Altman Plots.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: Mucopolysaccharidoses (MPS) are rare metabolic diseases that impair respiratory function leading to respiratory failure. This study aimed to compare maximal inspiratory and expiratory pressures (MIP and MEP) obtained in children with MPS and compare with predicted values from previous studies involving healthy children.

Methods: This is a cross-sectional study, in which the chest deformity was evaluated; MIP, MEP through digital manometer, and lung function through spirometry.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Background: Numerous measurement techniques for intra-abdominal pressure have been explored, with the Kron Technique established as the gold standard. Despite its prominence, the search for alternative methods persists due to its lengthy application time, the requirement for additional equipment, and overall impracticality. This study investigated a quicker, more accessible method for effective intra-abdominal pressure measurement in the emergency department.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!