AI Article Synopsis
- Metacognitive strategies are crucial for student learning and achievement, and this study explored how self-efficacy influences these strategies among medical students at Shiraz University.
- Using a quantitative approach with 225 participants, researchers analyzed data on self-efficacy and metacognitive strategies, confirming the validity of their questionnaires.
- The study found a significant positive correlation between self-efficacy and various metacognitive strategies, suggesting that students who believe in their abilities are more effective in their learning processes; the recommendation includes offering training to enhance self-efficacy and metacognitive strategies.
Article Abstract
Introduction: Metacognitive strategies play an essential role in students' learning and achievement; therefore, identifying their antecedents should be considered. This study indicated how self-efficacy, as motivational beliefs, affects the meta-cognitive strategies of medical students using a SEM approach.
Method: The present study was a quantitative cross-sectional research design, using a Smart-PLS 3 approach in which 225 medical students at Shiraz University of Medical Sciences were selected, using simple random sampling. Pintrich and De Groot's (1990) students' self-efficacy for learning and performance questionnaire and metacognitive learning strategies questionnaire developed by Dowson and McInerney (2004) were used to collect data. The collected data were analyzed using SPSS 21 and PLS 3 software.
Results: The validity and reliability of research questionnaires were confirmed by confirmatory factor analysis. The results showed self-efficacy had a positive and significant relationship with planning (r=0.24, p<0.001), monitoring (r=0.30, p<0.001) and regulating (r=0.31, p<0.001). Furthermore, self-efficacy had direct, positive and statistically significant effect on metacognitive learning strategies (β=0.42, p<0.001).
Conclusion: The findings suggest students who believe they are capable to learn and to do their academic tasks are more effective in adopting meta-cognitive strategies to achieve learning objectives than students who do not maintain such optimistic beliefs. Therefore, it is recommended that the officials of Shiraz University of Medical Sciences provide opportunities for strengthening the students' self-efficacy and metacognitive learning strategies through providing training courses. In these courses students should be explicitly instructed how a specific learning strategy is adopted, why it is important and when and how it applies to the specific task.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
|---|---|
| http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6820011 | PMC |
| http://dx.doi.org/10.30476/jamp.2019.81200 | DOI Listing |
Publication Analysis
Top Keywords
Similar Publications
AI Chatbots and Cognitive Control: Enhancing Executive Functions Through Chatbot Interactions: A Systematic Review.
Brain Sci
January 2025
Net Media Lab & Mind & Brain R&D, Institute of Informatics & Telecommunications, National Centre of Scientific Research 'Demokritos', 153 41 Agia Paraskevi, Greece.
: The evolution of digital technology enhances the broadening of a person's intellectual growth. Research points out that implementing innovative applications of the digital world improves human social, cognitive, and metacognitive behavior. Artificial intelligence chatbots are yet another innovative human-made construct.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFReducing cheap talk? How monetary incentives affect the accuracy of metamemory judgments.
Mem Cognit
January 2025
Department of Psychology, Technical University of Darmstadt, Darmstadt, Germany.
The accuracy of metacognitive judgments is rarely incentivized in experiments; hence, it depends on the participants' willingness to invest cognitive resources and respond truthfully. According to arguments promoted in economic research that performance cannot reach its full potential without proper motivation, metacognitive abilities might therefore have been underestimated. In two experiments (N = 128 and N = 129), we explored the impact of incentives on the accuracy of judgments of learning (JOLs), memory performance, and cue use in free recall of word lists.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFDiscrepancy between performance and feedback affects mathematics student teachers' self-efficacy but not their self-assessment accuracy.
Front Psychol
January 2025
Department of Educational Science, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany.
Although feedback is of high importance for the professional development of student teachers, the impact of (inadequate) feedback on their self-regulated learning is still unclear. In two studies with mathematics student teachers, we investigated how discrepancies between performance and feedback affected two important aspects of self-regulated learning-self-efficacy and self-assessment accuracy regarding mathematical content knowledge. In the first study, = 154 student teachers studying mathematics completed a knowledge test on the Pythagorean theorem and received performance feedback that was either correct or manipulated to be more positive or more negative than actual performance.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFTouch-driven advantages in reaction time but not in performance in a cross-sensory comparison of reinforcement learning.
Heliyon
January 2025
Centre for Tactile Internet with Human-in-the-Loop (CeTI), 6G Life, Technische Universität Dresden, Germany.
Recent research has highlighted a notable confidence bias in the haptic sense, yet its impact on learning relative to other senses remains unexplored. This online study investigated learning behaviour across visual, auditory, and haptic modalities using a probabilistic selection task on computers and mobile devices, employing dynamic and ecologically valid stimuli to enhance generalisability. We analysed reaction time as an indicator of confidence, alongside learning speed and task accuracy.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFEffects of sample size information and within- and between-category similarity on study choices in self-regulated learning.
Mem Cognit
January 2025
Center for the Study of Applied Psychology, Key Laboratory of Mental Health and Cognitive Science of Guangdong Province, School of Psychology, South China Normal University, 55 Zhongshan Avenue West, Guangzhou, 510631, P. R. China.
Category learning is usually better supported by interleaved training (alternating between exemplars from different categories) than by blocked training (studying all exemplars within a category sequentially), yet when asked to choose between the two strategies most people endorse blocking as superior. We used a prototype category-learning task to examine the effects of between- and within-category similarity and knowledge of the number of stimuli to be studied on study sequencing choices during self-regulated learning. Across three experiments (including a complete replication), participants who viewed the number of stimuli in each category showed more interleaving in comparison with those who did not, indicating that participants adjusted their strategy based on the projected length of the study phase.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFWant AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!