We investigated the role of initial DNA and chromosome damage in determining the radiosensitivity difference between the variant murine leukemic lymphoblast cell lines L5178Y-S (sensitive) and L5178Y-R (resistant) and the difference in cell cycle-dependent variations in radiosensitivity of L5178Y-S cells. We measured initial DNA damage (by the neutral filter elution method) and chromosome damage (by the premature chromosome condensation method) and compared them with survival (measured by cloning) for both cell lines synchronized in G1 or G2 phase of the cell cycle (by centrifugal elutriation) and irradiated with low doses of X rays (up to 10 Gy). The initial yield of DNA and chromosome damage in G2 L5178Y-S cells was almost twice that in G1 L5178Y-S cells and G1 or G2 L5178Y-R cells. In all cases DNA damage expressed as relative elution corresponded with chromosome damage (breaks in G1 chromosomes, breaks and gaps in G2 chromosomes). Also we found that the initial DNA and chromosome damage did not determine cell age-dependent radiosensitivity variations in L5178Y-S cells, as there was less initial damage in the more sensitive G1 phase than in the G2 phase. L5178Y-R cells showed only small changes in survival or initial yield of DNA and chromosome damage throughout the cell cycle. Because survival and initial damage in sensitive and resistant cells irradiated in G2 phase correlated, the difference in radiosensitivity between L5178Y-S and L5178Y-R cells might be determined by initial damage in G2 phase only.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|
Mol Cell Proteomics
January 2025
Center for Chromosome Stability, Institute for Cellular and Molecular Medicine, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen 2200, Denmark.
Accurate genome duplication requires a tightly regulated DNA replication program, which relies on the fine regulation of origin firing. While the molecular steps involved in origin firing have been determined predominantly in budding yeast, the complexity of this process in human cells has yet to be fully elucidated. Here, we describe a straightforward proteomics approach to systematically analyse protein recruitment to the chromatin during induced origin firing in human cells.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFPLoS One
January 2025
Department of Entomology and Acarology, Luiz de Queiroz College of Agriculture (ESALQ), University of São Paulo (USP), Piracicaba, São Paulo, Brazil.
Insecticide resistance is a major problem in food production, environmental sustainability, and human health. The cotton bollworm Helicoverpa armigera is a globally distributed crop pest affecting over 300 crop species. H.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFJ Cell Sci
January 2025
Department of Biomedical Engineering, Northwestern University, Evanston, Illinois, 60208, USA.
Disrupted nuclear shape is associated with multiple pathological processes including premature aging disorders, cancer-relevant chromosomal rearrangements, and DNA damage. Nuclear blebs (i.e.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFIndian J Occup Environ Med
December 2024
Viral Research and Diagnostic Laboratory (VRDL), Government Medical College, Patiala, Punjab, India.
Pesticides induce oxidative DNA damage and genotoxic effects such as DNA single-strand breaks (SSBs), double-strand breaks (DSBs), DNA adducts, chromosomal aberrations, and enhanced sister chromatid exchanges. Such DNA damage can be repaired by DNA repair mechanisms. In humans, single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) are present in DNA repair genes involved in base excision repair (BER) (, and nucleotide excision repair (NER) (, , , and ), and double-strand break repair (DSBR) ( and ).
View Article and Find Full Text PDFJ Exp Clin Cancer Res
January 2025
Department of Cardiovascular, Endocrine-Metabolic Diseases and Aging, Istituto Superiore di Sanità, Rome, Italy.
Background: Bacterial toxins are emerging as promising hallmarks of colorectal cancer (CRC) pathogenesis. In particular, Cytotoxic Necrotizing Factor 1 (CNF1) from E. coli deserves special consideration due to the significantly higher prevalence of this toxin gene in CRC patients with respect to healthy subjects, and to the numerous tumor-promoting effects that have been ascribed to the toxin in vitro.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFEnter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!