The ventral portion of the rodent hippocampus (HPC; anterior in primates) has been implicated in the detection and resolution of approach-avoidance conflict, which arises when an organism encounters a stimulus that predicts both positive and negative outcomes. Previous work has found differential regulation of approach-avoidance conflict behavior by the CA3 and CA1 subfields, with inhibition of ventral CA3 increasing approach toward conflicting stimuli and inhibition of the ventral CA1 potentiating avoidance. Here, we sought to extend these findings by investigating the role of the dentate gyrus (DG), the input region of the HPC, in learned approach-avoidance conflict processing in rats. Animals were first trained to acquire three different visuotactile cue-outcome associations in separate arms of a Y-maze (appetitive, aversive, and neutral). Postacquisition, they were administered a "conflict test," in which they were presented with a choice between exploring an arm in which the appetitive and aversive cues were concurrently presented (conflict stimulus), and another arm containing the neutral stimulus. GABAR-mediated inactivation of the ventral DG, but not dorsal DG, potentiated approach behavior toward the conflict stimulus, similar to the effects of ventral CA3 inactivation. In contrast, dorsal DG, but not ventral DG, inactivation was found to impair performance on a metric spatial discrimination task, which is commonly used as a test of pattern separation. The findings of this study demonstrate a robust double dissociation between the ventral and dorsal aspects of the DG, in line with previous reports of functional differences along the longitudinal axis of the HPC.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/hipo.23182 | DOI Listing |
Front Psychol
December 2024
Institute of Cognitive Science, University of Osnabrück, Osnabrück, Germany.
Introduction: Approach and avoidance behaviors have been extensively studied in cognitive science as a fundamental aspect of human motivation and decision-making. The Approach-Avoidance Bias (AAB) refers to the tendency to approach positive stimuli faster than negative stimuli and to avoid negative stimuli faster than positive ones. Affect and arousal in involved individuals are assumed to play a crucial role in the AAB but many questions in that regard remain open.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFBehav Res Methods
December 2024
School of Health and Society, University of Salford, Allerton Building, Frederick Road, Salford, M5 4WT, UK.
The growing interest in harnessing natural environments to enhance mental health, including cognitive functioning and mood, has yielded encouraging results in initial studies. Given that images of nature have demonstrated similar benefits, they are frequently employed as proxies for real-world environments. To ensure precision and control, researchers often manipulate images of natural environments.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFExp Psychol
July 2024
Psychology Department, Saarland University, Saarbrücken, Germany.
Research on automatic evaluative responses to faces varying in emotional expression and ethnicity has yielded conflicting results. Some paradigms, like the Approach/Avoidance task, demonstrated interactive evaluation. In contrast, recent studies using the Evaluative Priming Task (EPT) yielded independent effects of expression and ethnicity.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFEur J Psychotraumatol
December 2024
Posttraumatic Growth Center, Department of Psychiatry, Kangnam Sacred Heart Hospital, Hallym University Medical Center, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
The 2014 Sewol ferry disaster is the only South Korean mass casualty incident broadcasted in real time and the first instance of the nation collectively experiencing a disaster through social media. Compared to the large body of literature on disaster media as a stressor, its role as a coping tool remains underexplored. We explored the associations between coping styles in disaster media use and the psychological impact of the Sewol ferry disaster among the South Korean general public.
View Article and Find Full Text PDFBackground: Although quite a few classifications of coping strategies have been proposed, with different premises, much less is known about the methods of interpretation and how people using different types of coping perceive their life difficulties.
Objective: To develop a verifiable algorithm for classifying perceived difficulties. The proposed classification was developed deductively, using "approach-avoidance" as the basis for cognitive activity aimed at taking on (approaching) a difficult situation or escaping from it, avoiding a solution to the problem.
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!