[A Human Factors Study Using VTA for Incident Cases in Radiotherapy].

Nihon Hoshasen Gijutsu Gakkai Zasshi

Graduate School of Health Care Sciences, Jikei Institute.

Published: December 2019

AI Article Synopsis

  • The increased precision of radiotherapy has raised workloads, making human errors more likely during treatment, which is a concern given the need for both efficiency and thoroughness.
  • The study analyzed five incident cases across four facilities to identify human factors contributing to errors, highlighting that deviations from standard operations often stem from patient-specific issues and unfamiliar situations.
  • Recommendations to reduce human errors include minimizing time pressure and multitasking, improving work conditions to enhance resilience, clarifying ambiguous procedures, and promoting standardized methods.

Article Abstract

In recent years, workload has increased with higher precision of radiotherapy. Although both efficiency and thoroughness of treatment are crucial, in such conditions, human error is easy to occur. In this study, five incident cases that occurred in four facilities were studied and analyzed from the viewpoint of human factors that contribute to errors using variation tree analysis. We also analyzed resilience (the ability to return to one's original state even if the system deviates from a stable state), which has attracted attention in recent safety research. There were potential factors represented by patient factors in all cases. These factors caused deviations from standard operations, and incidents occurred due to unfamiliar situations and operations. Furthermore, in four of the five cases, the cause of the incident was a resilience action or judgment that was deemed to have required "some sort of ingenuity or adjustment." It was found that human error occurred due to multiple simultaneous occurrences of potential factors, i.e., patient and human factors such as high workload, impatience, and work interruptions. A reduction in human errors can be achieved by avoiding time pressure and multitasking, creating work environment and working conditions that make resilience work well, revising ambiguous rules and procedures, and promoting standardized working methods.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.6009/jjrt.2019_JSRT_75.11.1249DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

human factors
12
incident cases
8
human error
8
potential factors
8
human
6
factors
6
factors study
4
study vta
4
vta incident
4
cases
4

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!