Purpose: We sought to further investigate the efficacy and safety of pioglitazone for chronic granulomatous disease (CGD) patients with severe infection.
Methods: CGD patients with severe infection were enrolled and treated with pioglitazone for 90 days. The degree of improvement in infection and the changes of dihydrorhodamine-123 (DHR) were used to evaluate the efficacy of pioglitazone. The adverse reaction of pioglitazone was also investigated.
Results: We planned to enroll 30 patients at first in the study. However, the study was terminated due to negative results from all 3 enrolled patients. The 3 patients were diagnosed with CGD by clinical characteristics, DHR analysis, and genetics analysis. Mutations were CYBB (c.177C>A; p.C59X) in P1, CYBB (c.1498G>T; p.D500Y) in P2, and NCF2 (c.137T>G; p.M46R) in P3, respectively. The age of onset of the 3 patients was within 2 years after birth. The most common sites of infection were lung, lymph node, skin, and soft tissue, which were experienced in all 3 patients. The age of administration with pioglitazone was 5.2 years, 16 years and 11.1 years, respectively. The 3 patients experienced no improvement in severity of infection and stimulation index of the DHR did not also improve after receiving pioglitazone 10, 45 and 90 days, respectively. No drug-related adverse reaction was found during the period of pioglitazone.
Conclusions: Low dose of pioglitazone did not improve the severity of infection and production of ROS in CGD patients with severe infection.
Download full-text PDF |
Source |
---|---|
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10875-019-00719-z | DOI Listing |
Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!