A PHP Error was encountered

Severity: Warning

Message: file_get_contents(https://...@gmail.com&api_key=61f08fa0b96a73de8c900d749fcb997acc09&a=1): Failed to open stream: HTTP request failed! HTTP/1.1 429 Too Many Requests

Filename: helpers/my_audit_helper.php

Line Number: 176

Backtrace:

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 176
Function: file_get_contents

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 250
Function: simplexml_load_file_from_url

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 1034
Function: getPubMedXML

File: /var/www/html/application/helpers/my_audit_helper.php
Line: 3152
Function: GetPubMedArticleOutput_2016

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 575
Function: pubMedSearch_Global

File: /var/www/html/application/controllers/Detail.php
Line: 489
Function: pubMedGetRelatedKeyword

File: /var/www/html/index.php
Line: 316
Function: require_once

Comparison of Temporary Epiphysiodesis With RigidTacks™ and Blount-Staples in a Porcine Animal Model Using Magnetic Resonance Imaging. | LitMetric

RigidTack™ is a newly developed implant for total temporary epiphyseodesis. The implant combines the technical advantages of the traditionally used rigid Blount-staples and the newer flexible eight-plates™. Thus, the implant is rigid like the Blount-staples, which may be a biomechanical advantage in temporary epiphyseodesis, and has an easy and guided implantation technique like the eight-plate™. As in eight-plates™, supposedly only two RigidTacks™ are sufficient for temporary epiphyseodesis compared to six Blount-staples in traditional treatment. The goal of this study was to compare Blount-staples and RigidTacks™ in regard to the total potential of growth arrest, the occurrence of postoperative implant-associated complications, secondary angular deformities, and central joint deformations. Twelve pigs were allocated in two groups (n = 6) for treatment of the proximal tibia. Total temporary epiphysiodesis was performed with either four Blount-staples or two RigidTacks™. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-scans were performed before and 14 weeks after surgery, and the amount and distribution of growth arrest were evaluated by measuring the interphyseal distance in nine defined zones. Total temporary epiphysiodesis with two RigidTacks™ resulted in a similar amount of growth arrest as that of four Blount-staples. No significant coronal or sagittal angular deformities or joint deformities were observed in either group; however, one secondary loosening of a Blount-staple occurred. The study concluded that Blount-staples and RigidTacks™ are adequate implants for total temporary epiphysiodesis. Whether or not the precise implant-placement through the guided implantation technique of RigidTacks™ and a reduced number of implants indeed lead to a reduction of secondary angular deformities has to be investigated in further clinical trials. © 2019 The Authors. Journal of Orthopaedic Research® published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of Orthopaedic Research Society. J Orthop Res 38:946-953, 2020.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jor.24532DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

temporary epiphysiodesis
16
total temporary
16
temporary epiphyseodesis
12
blount-staples rigidtacks™
12
growth arrest
12
angular deformities
12
epiphysiodesis rigidtacks™
8
blount-staples
8
magnetic resonance
8
resonance imaging
8

Similar Publications

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!