Objectives: We aimed to investigate the analgesic efficacy of intraperitoneal, incisional, and intraperitoneal + incisional levobupivacaine in laparoscopic gynecological surgery.

Methods: Group 1 received levobupivacaine 20 mL intraperitoneally, Group 2 received levobupivacaine 20 mL to the trocar wounds, Group 3 received levobupivacaine 20 mL intraperitoneally and levobupivacaine 20 mL to the trocar wounds. Postoperative abdominal pain at rest and during mobilization and shoulder pain were assessed at the 2nd, 4th,12th, and 24th postoperatively by VAS. If VAS was >3, the analgesia was assessed as inadequate, and diclofenac sodium was injected. In addition, time the first analgesic requirement, total analgesic consumption, analgesic effectiveness, and the satisfaction of patients about the analgesic method were recorded during the postoperative period.

Results: No significant difference was found between groups with respect to VAS (p>0.05). Patients in Group 2 had a higher postoperative analgesic consumption and lower timing of the first analgesic requirement than Groups 1 and 3, but these differences were not significant (p>0.05). The satisfaction of the patients about the analgesic technique was similar between the groups.

Conclusion: The use of levobupivacaine intraperitoneally is an alternative method to reducing of postoperative shoulder and abdominal pain in gynecological laparoscopic surgery. Also, we observed a lower total analgesic consumption and more analgesic effectiveness in intraperitoneal groups than the other. Further studies are needed with different intraperitoneal local anesthetics.

Download full-text PDF

Source
http://dx.doi.org/10.14744/agri.2019.46034DOI Listing

Publication Analysis

Top Keywords

intraperitoneal incisional
16
group received
12
received levobupivacaine
12
levobupivacaine intraperitoneally
12
analgesic consumption
12
analgesic
10
efficacy intraperitoneal
8
incisional intraperitoneal
8
incisional levobupivacaine
8
levobupivacaine laparoscopic
8

Similar Publications

Robotic assisted laparoscopy is increasingly popular for primary ventral and incisional hernia repair. A variety of robotic techniques have been described. More data is needed to evaluate the indications and benefits of these approaches.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Ventral hernias represent a prevalent surgical complication in contemporary medical practice, with incisional hernias being a common long-term outcome following abdominal surgery. There are many risk factors for abdominal incisional hernias, including surgical history, malnutrition, obesity, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, abdominal closure technique, and surgical site infection. Laparoscopic repair of incisional hernias is the optimal surgical approach, as it is associated with reduced hospital stays, fewer perioperative complications, and lower recurrence rates.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

A comparative study between condensed polytetrafluoroethylene hernia mesh versus other composite meshes in Endo-laparoscopic ventral hernia repair.

Asian J Surg

November 2024

Division of Minimally Invasive Surgery, Department of Surgery, National University Hospital, Singapore; Department of Surgery, National University of Singapore, Singapore.

Introduction: Laparoscopic ventral hernia mesh repair (LVHR) is gaining popularity possibly due to reduced complications, reduced hospital stay, early return to work and better cosmesis. In intra-peritoneal onlay method (IPOM) a dual layer composite mesh with an absorbable barrier on the visceral surface is used for minimising bowel adhesions. Three most popular prosthetic mesh scaffolds are polypropylene (PP), polyester and expanded polytetrafluoroethylene (ePTFE).

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Propose: The aim was to evaluate results in terms of intra and postoperative complications, hospital stay, postoperative pain, functional recovery, aesthetic results and recurrence rate of totally endoscopic retromuscular hernia repair(eTEP-TAR)compared to conventional laparoscopic incisional hernia repair with defect closure(IPOM+)for right subcostal incisional hernias.

Methods: Data from consecutive patients requiring conventional minimally invasive subcostal incisional hernia repair collected from January 2014 to December 2018 were compared with patients underwent eTEP from January 2019 to July 2024 in a case-control study.

Results: 51 patients in the IPOM + group and 46 in eTEP group were included.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Long-term outcomes after open parastomal hernia repair at a high-volume center.

Surg Endosc

January 2025

Division of Gastrointestinal and Minimally Invasive Surgery, Department of Surgery, Carolinas Medical Center, Charlotte, NC, USA.

Background: Open parastomal hernia repairs (OPHR) are complex with high recurrence rates and no clear optimal technique. This report summarizes long-term OPHR outcomes at a high-volume hernia center.

Methods: OPHRs were identified from a prospectively maintained institutional database.

View Article and Find Full Text PDF

Want AI Summaries of new PubMed Abstracts delivered to your In-box?

Enter search terms and have AI summaries delivered each week - change queries or unsubscribe any time!